shadowkat: (Peanuts Me)
1. Just finished reading Powers of X #3 by Jonathan Hickman and RB Silva -- and my theory was correct, the flash-forward is in reality a flash-backward to one of Moira's previous lives. The series should be called the Many Lives of Moira McTaggert, which makes me think of the Disney flick about the cat that I saw as a wee tot, The Many Lives of Thomasina. Also it falls within the time travel explanation that the quatuum physicists attempted to explain to the MCU writers -- which is that you can't change the past, all you do is create another time line or reality.Read more... )

2. Walter Mercado - couldn't have predicted this -- Miami exhibit honoring the Puerto Rican astrologer who opened a window into self-care and spiritual wellness for millions of viewers
Read more... )
3. How Language Shapes Our Perception of Reality

excerpt )

4. How to Learn a Foreign Language as an Adult

I don't know. Learning a language is tough unless you immerse yourself. Although, I could try Spanish or Russian and easily find people to try it out on with no problems. I'm not in Kansas any more.

5. Making progress with Time Served by Juliana Keyes which is better than expected. Read more... )

6. Difficult morning commute. Read more... )

7. In other news, I'm contemplating attempting online dating again. Read more... )

Oh and, today is my parents' 54th wedding anniversary. They got married two years before I was born.

8. Veronica Mars. Read more... )
shadowkat: (Default)
1. Saw the movie Yesterday in Martha's Vineyard. I've mixed feelings about it. The more I think about it the more I like it. The premise is that a world-wide electro-magnetic shift thrusts all the characters into an alternate universe where various things no longer exist, such as The Beatles -- the Beatles is the focus, because the point of view character or protagonist is a Beatles fan and a struggling musician. The lead is rather good, but Lily James as the love interest felt a bit weak. I also liked Kate McKinnon as the crazy tough corporate music lable manager, attempting to make a killing.

The plot? Read more... )

2. CBD -- this is now legal in New York, and Mass, apparently. So far a mixed bag. My mother is able to use it South Carolina -- she uses one drop each night for her legs. I've used it to regulate mood and anxiety, also back pain -- and it works like a charm.

But alas, there are interesting side effects.Read more... )

3. Veronica Mars.

I read about this on vacation but unfortunately the friend I was staying with had NEVER watched the show and had no interest.

So any Veronica Mars fans or viewers out there?

Veronica Mars Season 4 Ending that is Unfair to Fans

OR basically the ending that pissed off a million fans, or to be exact shippers.
(I'm not sure anyone but the shippers is still devoted to the series. I lost interest ages ago with the lackluster third season and the bland movie. Rob Thomas, as a writer, is uneven, and a bit grating. I didn't fall for iZombie, and got tired of Mars mid-way through the third season. Yes, I know, he's doing "Noir" but it's sort of Noir light, and I've seen it done better elsewhere.]

Anyhow, he decides apparently to really do noir in Season 4. I'd considered getting a brief Hulu subscription to watch Veronica and S3 of Runaways back to back in December and January, but now I'm on the fence.

Spoilers )

4. For Marvel fans...MCU Phase 4 and 5 plans.. SDCC has released some exciting news.

* They are doing a Female Thor film, that will premiere in 2020, starring Natalie Portman, when Jane Foster becomes Thor.

Wait. What? Wow.
Details and casting spoilers below )

* Phase 4 - all Marvel's upcoming movies and television series

- Black Widow (a turning point in her life, pre-Avengers) - MAy 1, 2020

- The Falcon and the Winter Solider (fall 2020) - Disney Channel as a limited series
Read more... )

- The Eternals - November 6, 2020

Read more... )

* In 2021, Marvel will release its first film about a superhero of Asian descent. Meet Shang-Chi, a martial arts master played by Simu Liu. Liu is best known for his role on the Canadian sitcom Kim’s Convenience, and he’ll be starring in The Legend of the Ten Rings with Awkwafina and Tony Leung. Awkwafina’s role has yet to be announced, but Yeung will be playing the notorious Marvel supervillain the Mandarin. (Not the fake Mandarin we met in Iron Man 3 — the real one.)

* WandaVision -- limited series on the Disney+
Read more... )


- Doctor Strange and the Multi-Verse of Madness
Read more... )

* Loki -2021 or how the MCU keeps characters alive, while keeping them dead at the same time.

Read more... )

* What IF? (Oh this is cool, it's animated, and an adaptation of Marvel's legendary What If series.)
Read more... )

* Hawkeye - Disney + limited series

Read more... )

* Blade is being redone with Marshali Ali
Read more... )

YES!

* And of course, we're getting Captain Marvel 2, Black Panther 2, and Guardians of the Galaxy 3.

It's a great time to be a superhero fan. Isn't it?

5. Marvel X-Men Plans Revealed

And these are really interesting and different.

Jonathan Hickman is returning to Marvel next week to light a fire under the X-Men, and at San Diego Comic Con, he shared his plans for the first wave of X-Men comics to follow his place-setting launch titles, House of X and Powers of X.

Six books launch in the first wave: X-Men (Cyclops, Christopher Summers, Rachel Grey, Cable, Jean Grey, Vulcan, Havok, and Wolverine), Excalibur, X-Force, New Mutants, Fallen Angels and Marauders.

"House of X and Powers of X lay the groundwork for a whole new world of X-Men stories for years to come, and the Dawn of X books are the promise of that new world come to life,” said X-Men Senior Editor Jordan D. White in a press statement.

White later told Polygon more about the lead in books: "[After House of M] the [books] became less about acceptance by humankind and more about the fact that they were going extinct and that they might disappear as a species. That was the driving force of the X-Men, and while there have been fluctuations in that story over the years, I still think that generally that’s been the thrust of the line for quite a while. I think it was time for a change.”

Powers of X (pronounced "Powers of Ten" at the panel, but it's not clear if that was trolling or not) is the story of mutants throughout time, while House of X is more about the mutants in the now, though the two intertwine. They then reset the X-Men the same way "Disassembled" did to the world of the Avengers, and from there, the first wave of new books launch.


* X-men

X-Men #1 launches in October, written by Hickman with art from Leinil Francis Yu (who recently helped launch Ta-Nehisi Coates' Captain America).

This is the flagship X-book with the heaviest hitters and the series driving the rest of the line. It ALSO has almost nothing but Summerses on the cover - Cyclops, Jean Grey, Rachel Grey, Cable, Corsair, Havok, and okay-if-you-say-so-but-only-because-I-trust-you-Jonathan Vulcan - along with Wolverine in his scientifically proven best costume.


YES. A dream book for Cyclops fans everywhere.

* The Marauders

Marauders #1 also launches in October, from Gerry Duggan (Guardians of the Galaxy, Infinity Wars) and Matteo Lolli (Asgardians of the Galaxy).

This book has Emma Frost's Hellfire Trading Company funding a team of Marauders sailing the seas protecting mutants and presumably doing some light raiding. The team is led by Captain Kate Pryde and Lockheed, with Iceman, Storm, Bishop, and Pyro rounding out the crew. This book should probably be called Privateers but who am I kidding, I'm probably buying an X-Men book with Storm, Bishop, and Iceman on it.


[And from the cover? It appears that someone finally decided to give Emma Frost a costume that doesn't make her look like a Victoria Secret take on a Dominatrix Superhero.]

*The New Mutants (which frankly looks like a throwback, and again, a how-to guide on how Marvel resurrects a slew of characters that it recently killed off during a previous run)
Read more... )

* The Excalibur

Read more... )

* Fallen Angels

Read more... )


*X-Force

Read more... )

This looks wickedly cool. Marvel is putting X-men front and center again, and yes, there are plans to pull them into the MCU movie-verse. But not until Phase 5.

They've plotted it out though, and promise no more rebooting after this -- we hope.
I'm looking forward to new stories starring my favorite characters. With cool art.

Also, just so you know, Tessa, The Valkeryi is my default icon. She's also the first LGBTQA superhero in the MCU. (Not in the comics -- the comics have Northstar as the first, a mutant, and Bobby Drake.)
shadowkat: (tv)
Be seeing lots of posts on lj about racism and sexism in television casting and storytelling plots lately. So I got curious and wondered if anyone had done an objective analysis. Searched the net and found the following articles, sites and data regarding the topic. Demonstrating several things I more or less already knew - the world is made incredibly small by the internet, the US is not the only country who has difficulty with this issue (unfortunately), and we are actually doing much better than we did a few years ago - sort of two steps forward and two steps back then two steps forward again. I'm beginning to think that's life in general - an absurd version of the Texas Two-Step.

Case in point:

Buffy the Vampire Slayer first aired in 1997. At that time, if you read some of the links below or just scan them like I did, you'll realize that the networks were under the misbegotten belief that placing minorities in lead roles was bad for business. The NAACP got pissed and took them to task over this around 1999-2000. There were of course a couple of exceptions - but they weren't young teen shows. The exceptions were ER, Homicide Life on the Streets, the situation comedies on UPN, and the cast of Star Trek Voyager. DS9 was also an exception, but I think almost off the air at that point. Star Trek unlike most genre television, was actually pretty good with minority casting. Gene Roddenberry sort of broke the barrier wall in that regard in the 1960s with the original Trek - airing tales about racism on his show. But most TV shows contained white casts - such as Friends and Sex in the City, which if you live in NYC, you'll realize how unrealistic these shows are. This did not really change until around 2000, when the NAACP and SAG screamed at the US TV networks over it. SAG began to tabulate the number of female and minority roles in TV , Film and Theater in 1993 - releasing reports on the status, every couple of years, their data backed up the NAACP's claims.

Veronica Mars started after Buffy finished its run, in the fall of 2003, hailed by many fans as the new, albeit more racially diverse, Buffy. At the time Veronica aired, another backlash had occurred - the number of female roles and how women were being depicted was brought into question - articles littered the NY Times - blasting shows such as Boston Legal, Criminal Minds, Supernatural, and several quickly cancelled procedurals, as well as Veronica Mars for their lacklustre treatment of women. David E. Kelly got the message and added Candace Bergen to his cast. Supernatural hiding on the CW, then WB, got little fanfair. BattleStar Galatica was raved about as was Desperate Housewives. Grey's Anatomy starting mid-season, surprised everyone by doing much better than Boston Legal. Women, networks discovered, were a key demographic they could not ignore. Just as minorities were.

If you compare the casts of Veronica Mars to Buffy, you'll notice a couple of interesting factors.

Veronica, which began on UPN, which was targeting African Americans, had more men and less women in its lead cast over the three years it aired. It also had more minorities. The male best-bud - was African American, the biker guy, Hispanic. The Cordelia chick - African-American.

Buffy, which began on WB and was targeting a teen white female and male audience - had less men, but few minorities. In fact, you rarely saw any until around 1998 - or Season 3 of the series. Trick - was introduced around that period as a recurring character.By Season 4 - 1998-1999, we had Riley's friend and Gunn introduced in 1999 on Angel. In 2000...before Buffy moved to UPN, there's barely a minority in sight. When Buffy eventually moves to UPN, she stands out a bit like a sore thumb. If you check out UPN's shows during that period - almost all of them with the possible exception of Buffy and one other tv series, had minority casts. The Jamie Fox Show preceeded Buffy. At the same time, the NAACP and SAG were telling the networks that they had to cast more minorities. 2002-2003 rolls along and we start to see the recurring roles filled by minority cast members - including Iyari as Kennedy, Rhona, Wood, Nikki Wood as the First, several of the slayers, and an African American Pop singer who plays a demon that takes an interest in Xander. Buffy premiered towards the end of the 1990s, a period that had few television series with minorities, and in which the networks and advertisers were ignoring the minority demographic. If you look at the young adult and teen shows during that period, which included Dawson's Creek, Gilmore Girls, 90210, Melrose Place, Friends, Seinfeild, Will and Grace... you'll notice that there were few minorities in them. Prior to this period we had Doogie Howser, Square Pegs, and the Wonder Years - which were also minority free or close to it.

In the 21st Century - The higher rated series - are ones that have minorities and women in their casts now. House, Lost, Desperate Housewives, Ugly Betty, Grey's Anatomy, Heroes, even BSG which is getting higher ratings on cable. In demographic studies - more African Americans, Women, and Hispanics were found to watch television than Caucasions, and men. Interesting. This may or may not have an effect on the change.

I thought about doing a statistical analysis of genre tv shows, to see how many women and minorities each cast, but I don't the time or energy. Curious to know if anyone else has attempted it - just to see the numbers. The one's I'm most interested in seeing are:

Buffy
Angel
Supernatural
Star Trek the Next Generation
Battle Star Galatica
Firefly
Smallville
Doctor Who

In the non-genre series category -

The West Wing (which I know was too lily white when it began and got loads of criticism, it was one of the shows attacked in the 90s for not having a diverse cast)
Grey's Anatomy
ER
Chicago Hope
CSI

I'd also love to see a demographic analysis of those series. How many whites, blacks, hispanics, asians, women, and men watch and what age groups.

Anywho, for those who are interested here's the links I found worth looking at regarding the representation of minorities and women in television roles from 1973-2007. I could not find any data for 2008. These also serve as my endnotes or references for the points I made above.

Stung by Criticism In 1999 Networks Start to Add Minorities to TV Shows - The West Wing is Singled Out"

The Numbers Game - 1994

Minorities and the Media- Little Ownership and Even Less Control

Anything But Racism: Media Make Excuses for White Washed Line-up - 2000

Census 2006 - Shows Changes in TV and Interactive Media Sectors (UK-2006, British Broadcasting employment stats)

Recognition & Respect: a Content Analysis of Primetime Characters across three decades

Gender and Television - how women are depicted on TV - goes up to 90s

Casting the American Scene - a Look at Characters on PrimeTime and Daytime Television From 1994-1997 - Fairness & Diversity in Television: Update and Trends since the 1993 Screen Actors Guild Report on Women and Minorities on TV

Canadian Law regarding Sex-Role Portrayal Code in Radio and Television Broadcasting"

Media Watch - Associations around the world dedicated to monitoring how women are portrayed on TV and how to correct it"

"Stastical Report on Women's Roles on TV"

Media Awareness Reports - Stats on Minorities on TV from 1993-1994

Representation of Women in TV Writing and Film Writing Sectors

Statistics of Women and Minority Representation on UK TV Shows"

Ethnic and Visible Minorities in Entertainment Media

SAG Reports Roles for Minorities and Women Increasing since 2005

SAG Casting Statistic Reports up to 2006

PDF of SCREEN ACTORS GUILD DIVERSITY CASTING REPORT, Including Stats for 2006
shadowkat: (tv)
[Ugh, haven't accomplished much outside of grocery shopping, comic shopping (Whedon's X-men and a Wizard mag with a disappointing Whedon article, Dark Knight Returns article and a confusing article on Richard Donner's Superman II. Plus a bit on Stephen King's two sons who have managed to become successful writers. Never heard of them. But they are apparently out there and published:Joe Hill and Owen King. Only thing I like that King writes is his column for Entertainment Weekly, which come to think of it is the only thing I really like in that mag anymore.) Am feeling unmotivated and kicking self for it per usual - see icon - that's me fighting my social malaise, except I'm not a blond and not short. ].

Watching Torchwood now. Starting with Kiss Kiss Bang Bang again, because it's fun and happens to be on and nothing else I'm remotely in the mood for is. Well except for maybe, Day After Tomorrow - a horrendous yet oddly entertaining disaster flick starring a bored Dennis Quaid, who has aged remarkably well. cut for spoilers for the folks who still live under rocks and snark because if you can't be snarky in your own journal where can you? )

Last night, while reading a really crappy article about Juno in EW, I got to thinking about how women have been presented on film and tv. The lead in Juno and the writers of the article argue that we haven't had rebel women in film or books. We don't have the female version of "Holden Caulfield" - instead women are shown as a support system for men. Note Sarah Connor who is all about John Connor in Terminator. Or in Breakfast Club - the rebel Ally Sheedy who changes her style to get Emilio Estevez. All the Molly Ringwald films are about the girl getting a guy. Even Heathers - the lead goes bad because of the guy, JD who motivates her. OR they are freaks like the girls in Ghost World. Juno - they state breaks the mold, because she is a 16 year old teen who is pregnant, keeps the kid, and is blase about her sexuality, allows herself to have pleasure with sex and is about the conquest and the consequences, that men don't have to deal with. Then they congratulate the script-writer, a tough woman, who was a former stripper and phone sex operative. What is amusing about the article and annoying is ironically the writer and the character in Juno are still all about the man. They are his sex toy or he is their's. They have his kid. While in Catcher in The Rye - Holden Caulfield wasn't worrying about any women, besides his kid sis. Rebel without a Cause? Natalie Wood's character was a side-issue, completely supporting. In the male rebel films - the women aren't the point, they aren't the main issue, they are not his purpose.
It's not about the guy getting the girl - it's about the guy's journey and she just happens to be on the path. Yet in chick lit and chick flicks - it's about getting married, finding the guy, getting the guy with just a few exceptions.

Working Girl - Harrison Ford plays the hunk, but he's not the point. Melanie Gritthif's character's story is about winning the job and getting that promotion, making her own way.
He's just one of the perks.

Little Black Book - The heroine gives up the guy and goes for the career.

Buffy the Vampire Slayer - Buffy was about the girl saving the world. She did it her way not the guy's way. She was a rebel. Faith - another character in the show - a rebel - same deal.
Neither ended up with men, neither had kids. They didn't become a support system. They were rebels. It's only in fanfic written mainly by "female" fans that they make a man, be it Spike, Xander, Riley or Angel the center of the heroine's world - her point of being. And goal. In fanfic - Buffy is the supportive one, the guys rule. If they don't - she spends all her time saving them, protecting them, healing them. Focused on having kids. If she's not, she's being blasted by the writer and the characters for daring to put her career of being the slayer before them. For going down a path most women never dare to venture down. A path in our culture that is usually reserved for men. Willow - a character often abused in fanfic and hated by many female fans - was not interested in men at all. And power was earthly and magical. Brainy. Not brawn.

Xenia - was about a female warrior with a cute female side-kick. Male fantasy? Maybe. But women flocked to it as well in it's later seasons.

Firelfy - the hero in Firefly is ironically a girl, not the male gunfighter. She's smarter, brighter, and stronger than he - and it is a man who supports her. It's an odd twist. Firefly is an odd show because it shows many female stereotypes, yet also twists them, and there are a few rebels.

Veronica Mars - a snarky female detective who does not rely on anyone and puts her wits, career, and own ambitions before relationships. Who is not interested in getting married or having kids. And at the same time is fairly open about her sexuality and comfortable in it.
The guys support her not the other way around. All the while she snarks about phonies. If we need a female Holden Caulfield? This is our lady. Far more so than the others. Unlike Summer Glau's character in Firefly or SMG's Buffy or even Xenia and Willow - Veronica has no brawn, no superpowers - just her wits, her snark, and her own sense of self to keep her going.

BattleStar Galatica - Here we have the wonderful Starbuck. She smokes cigars. She is a fighter pilot. She gambles. She snarks. She's got the best lines. And she has sex with whomever she wants. Traditionally a male role played by sexy hunks such as Dirk Benedict and Harrison Ford, Katee Sackoff's take is as Holden as you get. Far more so than Juno. She's not clever just to be clever, she's tough, she has steel inside and she goes her own way. You don't see Starbuck supporting anyone. She's her own woman. Same with Roslyn - the prez - tough as nails.

Then there's Farscape - Aeryn Sun - who gives John Crichton a run for his money. She becomes wife and mother, but at the same time can clearly clean John's clock and fly a ship and if anything he supports her, or they support each other as equals.

These shows escape some of the patronistic tendencies we see in so many tv shows and films.
Doctor Who - sure has the female sidekick - but she's still little more than a sidekick, playing the Doctor's conscience. Often seen as a romantic interest for *him*. And often played as a sexy one. Same deal with Torchwood - although Gwen is not played as a sex symbol nor is Tosh - if anything Jack himself is the sex symbol in that show. In some respects, Torchwood is far less patronistic than Doctor Who, allowing a woman at times to run the show.
Gwen ran things when Jack was gone and did not do a bad job of it.

In books? Do we have female Holden's who not into just being the support for the guy or having kids or mothers? Sure we do. You just have to look for them. Kim Harrison's novels aren't bad. Unfortunately the historical ones, the classics, oddly written by women who spent their lives fighting for women's rights and unmarried/childless - are about finding the guy, getting married and having kids. Jane Austen & Louisa May Alcott both come to mind.

I don't know. Going to watch Sleeper now on Torchwood. It's taping too. But I'm in the mood to watch it now. May come back to edit this later. Then again, may not.
shadowkat: (Default)
Veronica Mars fascinated me tonight - and since it came after an hour of semi-boredom flipping between Friday Night Lights (which I suppose would grab your interest if you haven't seen this sort of thing before - families obsessed with high school football is neither new to me nor really all that interesting, if you think people went nutty over BTVS, you have not met a football fan. To this day, I despise The Broncos and The Cheifs. And to be honest, BTVS was more interesting to talk about, in short - so not my cup of tea), and Gilmore Girls, which was mildly better than last week. (More Lane and Paris, less Luke and his family.) Ghod I miss House. Really miss House.

But back to VM.

VM surprised me. I honestly thought it was going to do something completely different. It's rare that tv surprises me. Actually haven't been pleasantly surprised in quite a while. So, you'll understand that when it happens, I grin. The fact that it is happening via cultural media lately feels a tad pathetic, but hey, beggars can't be choosers - right?
Veronica Mars Spoilers )

Nip/Tuck isn't really worth discussing, except that I think the show may have jumped the proverbial shark. Almost switched to Boston Legal which has the distinction of having three Star Trek alum playing lawyers or legal people - Shatner, the guy who played Odo, and Armin Shimmerman. Watching Shimmerman and that guy who played Odo act off each other is a bit of a treat. Plus we have James Spader flirting with Candice Bergen. LOL! Now if only they weren't doing it all in court rooms and as lawyers, I'd watch it.
shadowkat: (Default)
[Can't decide what is worse the period before the job interview or the period after? The interview itself isn't such a big deal, but before you worry if you've prepared enough and after you worry if you screwed up. Right now, I've just about convinced myself I didn't get the job and will have to go through the whole thing again soon. As a result, I find myself feeling quite bristly and depressed this morning - much like the weather outside my window. Hoping mood clears up by 4pm - have a concert that I'm going to at Lincoln Center. It's free and I'm seeing it with the NYC Movie Critics Group I recently joined.

As an aside - you ever feel as if you have been thrown into a play, you don't know the lines, you don't know what role you are supposed to play, and feel as if you are just fumbling about making a complete and utter fool of yourself?]

Warning much snark below, because this is TV and I refuse to take it seriously. Plus TV is a safe topic to snark about, right? It's not like religion or politics? Okay, yes, I realize this is a niave and stupid statement coming from an individual who started her online writing career posting television essays to fanboards.

Well, I've watched this week's premieres more or less, only one I missed was the pilot for Friday Night Lights and well anything that is on the pay cable channels, a la Showtime and HBO - because even I can't watch everything. After awhile it all starts to become one big blur anyways. Plus I do not own a DVR or Tivo, nor can I tape anything any longer. Somewhat limited here.

What I did watch:

1. Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip - already discussed in a prior post. I'm worried about it.
Only three people on correspondence list besides myself are devoted. That is not good, since currently correspondence list's reactions to new series and the Neilsen's reactions to new series appear to be in synch. Frex - everyone online that watched the show the previous week, with four exceptions (myself included) was disappointed. Half did not try it a second week. (While they all came back for Heroes). Damn. Studio 60 is the only show on tv that does not have sex or violence featured as a plot point. Which begs the question: Can we watch something that is propelled purely by dialogue and not by sex and violence? (That's meant to be a rhetorical question by the way.)

2. Heroes - seen the episode twice now - at 7pm tonight, because there was zip else on. All I'll say is: It is not an series that improves on a second viewing. But don't worry about it - according to the entertainment mags - it's the next big hit - or this year's "Lost". People adore it. And Hiro? He's apparently the break-out performance this year or "pop culture" trend. The poster child for Geekdom - at least according to the mags. Heroes according to TV Guide spoilers - is supposed to get even better as we move forward. There's even a possibility that the evil super-powered serial killer is not who I think it is, which would be cool. Heck anything with Adrian Psdar in it, I'm willing to watch. And yes, I like Hiro too. Is there anyone out there who doesn't? It would be like not liking a puppy dog or something?

4. Veronica Mars - I enjoyed it. But - it had problems and I worry about its longevity. Granted, Rob Thomas is not good at introductions or summary episodes, and the man clearly hates exposition and/or wrapping up loose ends. Because, the Keith Mars subplot that hung over from last season, you know the one with Kendall Casablancas and the suitcase? I needed the internet to explain it to me or rather numerous people sharing what they picked up. Not one person - but several different posters. The fact it took ten or fifteen people exchanging information in two discussion threads on two different lj's for me to figure out what actually did happen (and I still might have a few facts off), should tell you something right there.

Here's what I managed to get from the online crowd: ( specifically [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink, Masq, and [livejournal.com profile] herself_nyc's lj's, thanks guys, because I was as lost as you were) : Spoilers )

The problem with the subplot - which would have been clearer if it were the only mystery we had to figure out or was at least directly linked to whatever Veronica was doing - was this subplot was threaded or cut within the VM mystery and the Logan/Dick story. The Logan/Dick - VM stories actually coincide. Keith's seemed like we were watching another show or rather it reminded me of when I was attempting to flip between VM and Lost last year and got predictably confused. Last season Thomas struggled with the transistions between Keith and Veronica's mysteries a bit as well. It's why the pacing got so slow at times and the story got muddled. It worked fine when the two stories jivved. Not when they had zip to do with each other. The first season this was not a problem - since Keith's mystery and Veronica's were more or less one and the same.

I liked the rest of VM. spoilers fairly vague for S2 VM, S3 VM. )

Enjoyable, just confusing and slow in places. VM is an odd show - it tends to pick up steam for me later in the season, the first five episodes? I tend to be ambivalent about. This worries me, since VM only got 13 this year. This show needs more than 13. [Am wondering if VM may work better on DVD as a telenovela? People who've watched the DVD's seem to react differently than those of us who watch it as it is broadcast.]

4. Lost - Not sure how long I'm going to stick with Lost for numerous reasons - the main one being that most of the social groups I've joined like to do things on Wedensdays. The other - well, see behind the spoiler cut.

Spoilers for Lost )

5. The Nine - not bad. But not something that's going to keep me home or awake on Wed nights either. And next week - watching the Project Runway finale. I skipped the reunion. I don't need to watch tv to see people cut each other into ribbons. But am very curious to see who wins out of the finale four, especially now that I've seen everyone's runway shows. Personally? I'd pick either Laura or Uli, but I'm betting the judges pick Jeffrey - who of the four seems to have the most versatile look. Sorry, I should be talking about the Nine not PR here. Which may tell you something. The Nine was interesting. It reminded me a great deal of Spike Lee's The Inside Man. Except I liked the Inside Man a bit more.

spoilers )

6. Grey's Anatomy - remains my comfort show. Watching Grey's feels a bit like drinking a glass of ice cold water on a hot sweaty day or just snuggling up with coco in front of fire while it is snowing outside. It's refreshingly simple and comforting. And one of the few shows in which I like most if not all of the characters. Okay, I do like Derek, just not when he's being McDreamy or Meredith's love interest. spoilers for S2 and vaguely S3 Greys )

I'm love Grey's for Christina (who makes me laugh), Alex, Izzy, George, Callie, the Chief, Dr. Sloan, Burke, Bailey, and Addison. That's why I watch it. And this episode was more enjoyable the last two partly because it focused more on these characters and less on Meredith.

7. BattleStar Galatica - still packs a punch. And watching the websoides did help.
I liked aspects of it. The Starbuck(kara Thrace)/Leoben storyline is going to get on my nerves soon.
spoilers for BSG )

[Updated: For a truly excellent analysis of this episode go here: http://coffeeandink.livejournal.com/636582.html?style=mine#cutid1.
Coffeeandink really points out how the episode works and why the writers chose to do what they did. Reading it changed my mind.]

8. I also watched Nip/Tuck - spoilers )
shadowkat: (demonize me)
Edgy, discombobulated, depressed and want a hug. Current state of mind. Also would not mind being hit by a bus, although I think I'd probably survive it or be kept alive, since haven't completed my living will yet, and that would not be fun. Am kidding. Well sort of. This whole treading water crap at work is driving me batty, let's face it I've treaded water for so long now that I'm beginning to feel like a prune. Don't know what to do. Usually in these situations - I start hunting a job elsewhere. Am tempted, but the idea of going back out there again and interviewing is not something I want to deal with - especially if it's just for another job like the one I already got.

TV shows: Alias, Veronica Mars, Desperate Housewives )

Currently reading this book by Walter J. Miller called "A Canticile for Leibowitz", which tapped me on the shoulder in the book store and said, read me. I was there to buy Butcher novels and had three in my hand, when my eye landed on it. Walked away from it. Came back. Read the back. Read the first two paragraphs. Read the introduction by Maria Doria Russell about the difference between fiction and literature - there isn't one. Put it down, left. Came back again. Left again. Came back a third time and bought the thing. Raced through the rest of the not-so-great Sookie Stackhouse novel I'd been reading, and picked it up to read on the train on Monday. Told self if puts me to sleep will go back to Sookie Stackhouse - have one novel left of the lacklustre series - there's six in all. And it did put me to sleep, so tried to put it aside. But no, I had to pick it up again and read some more last night and once again, it found its way into my bag to be read on the train this morning. Persistent little book. Do books do this to anyone else? Say, you have to read me? Now! Probably not. I'm just crazy. I know this.

Near as I can tell, Book is about an order of monks in the distant future.One monk in the desert doing a fast, stumbles upon a fallout shelter and several papers from a by-gone era. The description on the back of the book reads as follows: "Winner of the 1961 Hugo Award for Best Novel and widely considered one of the most accomplished, powerful and enduring classics of modern speculative fiction [if I had a dollar for every book that claimed that I'd be rich], Canticle for Leibowitz is a true landmark of twentieth-century literature - a chilling and still provocative look at a post-apocalyptic future."

"In a nightmarish ruined world slowly awakening to the light after sleeping in darkness, the infant rediscoveries of science are secretly nourished by cloistered monks dedicated to the study and preservation of the relics and writings of the blessed Saint Issac Leibowitz. From here the story spans centuries of ignorance, violence, and barbarism, viewing through a sharp, satirical eye the relentless progression of a human race damned by its inherent humanness to recelebrate its grand foibles and repeat its grievous mistakes." [It also claims to be funny and tragic at the same time.]

So I open the book and the Introduction by sci-fi writer Maria Doria Russell, [apparently Miller is dead or unavailable and can't do it himself], starts off with the question: "Fiction or Literature?" [As a former English Lit major who adores graphic novels and genre novels much to the chagrin of many a friend and professor, this amuses me greatly.]

"Go into a bookstore and you'll find novels shelved alphabetically by author's last name but divided into a number of categories: mystery, science fiction, romance. Each genre gets its own section, which is understandable, but then there are novels classified as Fiction and others as Literature. What's the difference between the two?

My first guess was that to be Literature, the novel's author had to be dead.

That hypothesis was disproved the next time I checked the shelves. I looked both words up in the dictionary when I got home. Fiction was defined as 'any literary work portraying imaginary characters and events, as a novel, story or play,' while literature included 'all writings in prose or verse, especially those of an imaginative character, but especially those having excellence of rom or permanent value."

So basically, Literature is classier than Fiction.

Still curious, I started asking people in the book business how they decided what was classy enough to be Literature. The semiserious consensus among the pros was, "Of an editor has to look up three words while reading the manuscript, it's literature." The best answer I got was from my stepbrother Jack Provenzale, who doesn't sell books but is a passionate reader. He said, 'Literature changes you. When you're done reading, you're a different person.'

A Canticile for Leibowitz is Literature, no matter how you define it.

Its author, Walter J. Miller, Jr. is indeed dead: tragically (and ironically, considering the final third of the book), a suicide. [Ah dead. And a suicide no less.] Mr. Miller was by all accounts a difficult person who distanced himself from colleagues, friends and family and finally, after decades of increasingly unbearable depression, from life itself. In 1996, he died of a self-inflicted gunshot at the age of seventy-four. "

Russel goes on to state how reading this novel changed her each time she read it.

Okay....in other words, Literature is in the eye of the beholder, like pretty much everything else on the planet.

Do agree with her brother's view on Literature. I think the novels that haunt us and change us are the ones worth keeping, are literature. The ones that leave our memories, no matter how big and fancy and obscure the words, are fiction or non-fiction as the case may be.
Genre has zip to do with it. What is important is whether or not that magical moment occurs when you feel someone touching your hand and saying what you felt but could not put into words. OR flipping your perspective, so for a moment, you see through someone else's eyes. To do that, you do not need words that have to be looked up in a dictionary, but words that hit you between the eyes and make you sit up and take notice.

At any rate - first sentence of the book:"Brother Francis Gerard of Utah might never have discovered the blessed documents, had it not been for the pilgrim with girded loins who appeared during that young novice's Lenten fast in the desert."

First four sentences of second chapter:
"And then Father, I almost took the bread and cheese."
"But you didn't take it?"
"No."
"Then there was no sin by deed."
"But I wanted it so badly, I could tast it."

Ah, nice. Dialogue that serves a purpose. Been reading Charlain Harris novels, the dialogue is quite scannable. Charlain Harris novels are fiction in my opinion. I didn't leave them changed a wit. Comforting and somewhat distracting fiction, that requires little concentration and not much brain power, also lots of fun. But fiction all the same. Guilty pleasures. Must have them. Cotton candy for the brain.

At any rate new book has given me back my muse, which I'd mislaid for a bit. Actually finished Chapter 18 yesterday, had only been working on it for three weeks. And it's not a long chapter.
Will see how long stay with new book. Have finished first 40 pages. Not bad. Not as fast moving as other books or as gripping, but pulls at me and I can't let go of it. Hard to explain. Don't get it myself.

You must hate these rambles. No organization to them whatsoever.

Okay off for dinner. Feel less discombobulated and depressed at least. Don't know if will leave this up or not. Public for now. Figure haven't said anything too revealing that would get me into trouble. Then again, figured I hadn't at work either, until Boss cautioned me to keep my big mouth shut around certain people who would turn on me in an instant if it fit their purpose - which is one of the reasons felt discombobulated to begin with.
shadowkat: (Default)
I give up, was attempting without much success to find the 100 Questions Meme on the Flist. Sorry flist, haven't been reading it frequently enough.

Found lots of posts on Chronicles of Narnia though. It seems to be the in movie at the moment. Entertainment Weekly has an extensive article and review of it. They gave it a B. Time Out New York also has an article - this one is an interview with the director, who co-wrote the screenplay and lugged in two other far more competent writers when he realized that he was being perhaps too faithful to the original series.

Here's a few snippets from the blurb: "Most of what I pictured in my head when I read the books was the way it ended up in the movie." (He read them when he was eight years old then again while making the movie in detail.)
"When I came back and read the books as an adult, I flicked through these pages several times thinking, Where is the battle scene I remember? CS Lewis relies on imagination. HE plants a seed and lets it grow in your head. He says things like, "I can't tell you how bad this is or your parents won't let you read the book.' Immediately that makes you go, 'Shit, that must be really bad,' and you think up these amazing things." (True, I think half the pleasure of the books I read as a child and some tv shows I saw back then were the gaps in narration, where I filled in the story. As a result the story I remember no one else does or knows, because so much of it is in my head. Reading or watching anything is truly an interactive experience.) Andrew Adamson, continues to state: "I always felt like the middle of the book wasn't that exciting. It was a lot of kids running and the witch chasing them and it didn't even seem like they were running! In a book or script you can control the pacing, you can skip through the bits that seem slow and slow down on the bits that seem big. In a movie the director has to do that for you." To ensure it was authentic or as close to the book as possible they consulted Douglas Gresham, the author's stepson, who is an expert on all things Narnia. "A change had to really be a lot better than the book to justify it and if twas on par or 10 percent, why bother."

Another snippet, this one from Entertainment Weekly, regarding the appearance of the White Witch. The director and the actress playing the part apparently saw eye to eye on her appearence, just not on the interpretation of Narnia. Tilda Swinton saw Narnia as a kid fantasy, the director as a real place (not literally, just for film).
But both saw eye to eye on eschewing the typical witchy look. No long red nails, no red lipstick, and no black hair. "To my mind," says the actress, "it's a racist projection that villians should have black hair."(p. 36 of this week's ET.)

Looks like a good film. Going to wait a week to see it, when the crowds die down. I rarely see films on their opening weekend. Hence the fact I saw Rent this weekend instead.

Last weekend, rented Elephant Walk - the old Elizabeth Taylor movie. Was not as good as I remembered. Highly melodramatic in places and somewhat disappointing. Also a little slow. I remembered it differently.
Very odd.

Saw Veronica Mars this week. That show really does have on and off weeks. It feels more uneven writing and direction wise this season. vague, very vague spoilers for this past week's episode. )

Recently read an interview in TV Guide with Kristen Bell. In it she assumes that the entire Buffy fandom is watching Veronica Mars and not Lost and that the two shows do not attract the same audience. Chortles.
Uh. No. From what I've seen the BTVS/ATS fandom has split between the two. Half watches VM, Half watches Lost, and then there's a third group, like myself, that has managed to find a way of watching both. I like both for different reasons. VM appeals to the part of me that enjoys soap operas with a noir underpinings. Love the noir underpinings. Wish they went there more than with the soap opera, but hey it is TV. Lost appeals to my desire for existential/philosophical stories, and complicated twisty characters with loads of unexplored back story.
Lost is far more metaphorical and philosophical than VM. VM is well fun. Both are so serialized that it is well nigh impossible for a new viewer to get hooked on them without starting at the beginning or watching every episode. Which oddly enough has not hurt them as much as one would think.

Neither holds a candle to BattleStar Galatica, the new version, in my opinion. BSG still outshines everything else on TV.

Did watch Nip/Tuck, it's annoying me. Too over-the-top, too shocking, almost to the point of being eye-rolling laughable. The metaphors are also a tad too obvious, even someone who is completely literal minded and couldn't see a metaphor from a mile away would see these. Yet, I keep watching, I don't know why, I can't stop. I'm hooked on the Scean/Christian/Julia relationship and the chemistry between the actors playing them.

OH god, it's one thirty. I'm going to bed.
Page generated May. 15th, 2025 10:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »