![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. Yes, I know everyone is bored of the Whedon thing. But, this is kind of interesting. I found it finally on Twitter - it's about what lay behind the whole CC reveal, and those who followed. Hint - it wasn't about Buffy or the Marvel movies or for that matter, The Nevers. No, it is about Whedon's long running attempt to get into the DC film verse after leaving the Marvel film verse.
Or rather it's about the Zack Snyder Justice League film that Whedon took over. I don't know if you saw the Whedon version? I did. Or read about what was happening behind the scenes at the time - I did. Or saw all the films in the DC verse prior - I did. I'm a fan of superhero flicks and superhero comics, goes back to my college days, when I discovered the medium. I remember doing my thesis next to a guy in a library basement - typing away at computers in the 1989. The guy basically looked like Billy Idol except with curly hair. It was the 1980s and he was into punk rock and comics. He was doing his thesis on the death of the superhero in the graphic novel medium, specifically Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns, Red Son, and the Watchmen. I'd read all three - we had a very long discussion about it. This was long before we got good superhero flicks.
Anyhow, I've read a lot of the comics here and there, and seen all of the films in the franchise. With a few exceptions here and there. Also a good portion of the animated ones (not all, but a portion) and a portion of the television series.
Snyder had a mixed reviews - Snyder is a painter. His background is in high art. And he's a director - dealing mainly with visuals and FX. He also works in film - as most directors do, not digitial. Prefers film.
Watching a Snyder film is akin to watching a painting. Or being immersed in a visual world. His films often work best on a big screen. He's not really a writer - Nolan's brother tends to write Snyder's films, he's a director first and foremost - and works very well with people. The cast on Snyder's films - were his friends. His battles were with the WB, Geoff Johns (the comic book writer) and the studio heads - who wanted him to cut his film down to size, lighten it up a bit, etc.
What happened? Snyder's daughter died by suicide and he got tired of fighting the WB, and put his family first. The rest of the story is...appalling to say the least. And complicated.
You can find it HERE. It does not show various film critics, comic artists, comic fans, Whedon fans, Whedon, WB or comic writers in the best light. They basically took advantage of someone else's tragic loss for their own personal gain. It is appalling. They also lied about it.
It's an interesting read - because it shows how difficult the film industry can be and why so many go off and do their own things.
At any rate - there's apparently a Snyder Cut of Justice League premiering on HBO MAXtonight - ETA, misread, it's dropping 3/18/2021 - March. It's four hours long. And none of it includes Whedon's footage. Also, only five minutes of it were shot during the pandemic and after 2017. And Whedon's version only contained five 30 minutes of the original Zack Snyder cut - which is possibly why - the re-shoot was hell on wheels - because they basically re-shot the entire movie in less than four months. Cutting everything they did previously. After already shooting and working their asses off on the previous version. AND - various actors ended up with their scenes cut completely. It was - if you can imagine - shooting an entire movie over two years, only to have the director you've bonded with - get fired after his daughter died from suicide - and have a new director that you don't know jump in and throw his weight around. Force you to work hard and long hours, and say lines that you don't feel were in character, and do it in breakneck time, and act as if everything you did the past two years was pointless.
I'd have wanted to skewer Whedon and the WB for that alone. I don't blame the cast for hating them. Add to that - Whedon's version bombed, and the actors struggled afterwards. Plus the anticipated sequel was cancelled.
Now, finally, they get to see the version they worked hard on and were proud of - air. (They spent years trying to get to this point. The previous film aired in 2017.)
I can't see it tonight, but I'll try to see it over the weekend. I'm curious. Although - I'm not really a huge fan of Snyder's films - they give me a headache - all the fight scenes are like paintings, but also feel like watching a video game. So we'll see if I make it through it.
The twitter feeds mentioned Chris Helmsworth has been indicating issues with Whedon for years. So I looked.
Recalls Joss Whedons fury when Avengers Cast Kept Screwing up a Take
I think writers make bad directors for the most part.
2. Winter Storm and Texas Power Outage Map
Texas wanted its own power Grid to avoid the Federal Government - Now What?
Ted Cruz is not having a good year. Nor for that matter is Texas.
But I feel for my poor family members. I have three cousins, their kids, and youngest Aunt in Texas. I'd prefer that they be okay. So far they are.
3. Footloose or Dancing in the Movies
Off to bed. Assuming they quiet down upstairs. It is quiet. It just sounds like someone is moving furniture above me every once and a while.
Or rather it's about the Zack Snyder Justice League film that Whedon took over. I don't know if you saw the Whedon version? I did. Or read about what was happening behind the scenes at the time - I did. Or saw all the films in the DC verse prior - I did. I'm a fan of superhero flicks and superhero comics, goes back to my college days, when I discovered the medium. I remember doing my thesis next to a guy in a library basement - typing away at computers in the 1989. The guy basically looked like Billy Idol except with curly hair. It was the 1980s and he was into punk rock and comics. He was doing his thesis on the death of the superhero in the graphic novel medium, specifically Frank Miller's Dark Knight Returns, Red Son, and the Watchmen. I'd read all three - we had a very long discussion about it. This was long before we got good superhero flicks.
Anyhow, I've read a lot of the comics here and there, and seen all of the films in the franchise. With a few exceptions here and there. Also a good portion of the animated ones (not all, but a portion) and a portion of the television series.
Snyder had a mixed reviews - Snyder is a painter. His background is in high art. And he's a director - dealing mainly with visuals and FX. He also works in film - as most directors do, not digitial. Prefers film.
Watching a Snyder film is akin to watching a painting. Or being immersed in a visual world. His films often work best on a big screen. He's not really a writer - Nolan's brother tends to write Snyder's films, he's a director first and foremost - and works very well with people. The cast on Snyder's films - were his friends. His battles were with the WB, Geoff Johns (the comic book writer) and the studio heads - who wanted him to cut his film down to size, lighten it up a bit, etc.
What happened? Snyder's daughter died by suicide and he got tired of fighting the WB, and put his family first. The rest of the story is...appalling to say the least. And complicated.
You can find it HERE. It does not show various film critics, comic artists, comic fans, Whedon fans, Whedon, WB or comic writers in the best light. They basically took advantage of someone else's tragic loss for their own personal gain. It is appalling. They also lied about it.
It's an interesting read - because it shows how difficult the film industry can be and why so many go off and do their own things.
At any rate - there's apparently a Snyder Cut of Justice League premiering on HBO MAX
I'd have wanted to skewer Whedon and the WB for that alone. I don't blame the cast for hating them. Add to that - Whedon's version bombed, and the actors struggled afterwards. Plus the anticipated sequel was cancelled.
Now, finally, they get to see the version they worked hard on and were proud of - air. (They spent years trying to get to this point. The previous film aired in 2017.)
I can't see it tonight, but I'll try to see it over the weekend. I'm curious. Although - I'm not really a huge fan of Snyder's films - they give me a headache - all the fight scenes are like paintings, but also feel like watching a video game. So we'll see if I make it through it.
The twitter feeds mentioned Chris Helmsworth has been indicating issues with Whedon for years. So I looked.
Recalls Joss Whedons fury when Avengers Cast Kept Screwing up a Take
I think writers make bad directors for the most part.
2. Winter Storm and Texas Power Outage Map
Texas wanted its own power Grid to avoid the Federal Government - Now What?
Ted Cruz is not having a good year. Nor for that matter is Texas.
But I feel for my poor family members. I have three cousins, their kids, and youngest Aunt in Texas. I'd prefer that they be okay. So far they are.
3. Footloose or Dancing in the Movies
Off to bed. Assuming they quiet down upstairs. It is quiet. It just sounds like someone is moving furniture above me every once and a while.
no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 06:52 am (UTC)Wow. I didn't realise it had been THAT drastic.
I want to know if Snyder's cut is going to get a DVD release.
no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 02:07 pm (UTC)The release of the 4K Ultra HD of the Snyder Cut is tentatively scheduled in March 2021, shortly after the film’s release on HBO Max. Wonder Woman 1984 will have its 4K Ultra HD Release the following month.
Referenced Here
And apparently, Snyder did not just leave the film because of the death of his daughter - but he got tired of fighting the studio who didn't approve of the direction he wanted to take the film.
HERE.
Apparently this is the reason, Ray Fisher came out now with the allegations against Whedon and WB, and why Charisma Carpenter was pressured into revealing her story. (I honestly think they may have been surprised by the others that came out with it.)
no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 07:18 pm (UTC)30 minutes of Snyder, 90 minutes of Joss.
Snyder's original cut was apparently 4 hours, and they only kept 30 minutes of that. While Whedon's was three and 1/2 hours or thereabouts. Also, apparently Snyder only had to film an additional five minutes, the rest of it was pretty much ready to go in 2017.
I read another article - it happened before with Superman II - where Donner was pushed out, and someone else did a more comical version. He'd filmed Superman II and I back to back, with the idea that the end of Superman I would be the end of Superman II. The Donnor cut came out - but it felt repetitive, because he didn't film a new ending.
I think a lot of what happened last week is in direct response to a negative marketing campaign to get the Snyder Movie recognition by Fisher. What they didn't expect was the responses to CC's post. I doubt they knew about those - although CC may have.
no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-02-19 06:35 pm (UTC)I also figured out something rather interesting...today, regarding a time line of events.
1. Kai Cole alleges Joss Whedon's misconduct in August 2017
2. Joss Whedon takes over Justice League in May 2017
3. Justice League Tanks in December 2017.
4. Ray Fisher comes forward with allegations and renounced what he said in 2017 - Ray Fisher Allegations Arise in July 2020 against Joss Whedon
5. Late in 2019 a fan group pushed for the Snyder Cut, and they rose enough money for the Snyder cut to be completed. . Everything you need to know about the Snyder Cut
The Snyder cut was completed in July 2020 and they were pushing WB and HBO MAX to distribute and air.
6. Ray Fisher's allegations prompt an investigation into Whedon's actions on the set of Justice League in August and result in Charisma being brought in - Whedon leaves the NEVERS, and leaves Twitter in November.
7. February 11 - Charisma Carpenter,after 20 years of silence, comes forward with her statement against Whedon - supporting Fisher, and Fisher/Charisma - #IStand - happens.
8. Snyder Cut is pushed on social media with the #IStand movement. And is tagged.
9. Feb 12 - they announce the Snyder Cut release on HBO Max.
10. More people come out against Whedon - notably people who are not necessarily friends of CC or Snyder - MT, SMG, EC, Amber Benson, Danny Strong, Tom Lenk, Adam Busch, Marti Noxon, Jose Molina...this lends weight to it. (If they hadn't said anything, I'd have remained skeptical.) They notably come out before CC's close friends and con buddies do - who wait longer, DB, JM, Julie Benz, Nick Brendan, J August, Amy Acker, Eliza Dusku.
11. Feb 14 - Official Trailer for the Snyder Cut of Justice League Drops - and the full story behind the reshoot and Snyder's problems WB are released.
By Feb 16, it stops coming out. No one else says anything.
Okay, that's an interesting pattern. Feels like a marketing campaign utilized to promote a movie and get it distributed.
So, all this came out because they wanted to release a different cut of a big superhero movie? Really? I hope I'm wrong - but it feels almost too neatly timed.
And what do Angel, Buffy, and Justice League have in common? WB
We get very little from Firefly. Nothing from the Avengers, Nevers, Dollhouse, or Cabin in the Woods.
I think this is about Warner Brothers - and use of negative marketing to promote a product. (I also believe Whedon did all that. But I don't think Snyder, his fans, or WB are clean either.)
no subject
Date: 2021-02-20 05:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-02-20 10:02 pm (UTC)It does however provide a kind of background for how and why a lot of this came out twenty years later. I sincerely doubt it would have - otherwise. Warner Brothers, Geoff Johns and Whedon pissed off Zack Snyder, who in turn prompted Fisher to come forward. I doubt Fisher would have if it weren't for two things: 1) The Zack Snyder Cut - which a lot of people wanted HBO Max to distribute, and 2) Fisher getting fired from the Flash - although it is unclear if that didn't happen after the allegations were raised.
It's kind of why a lot of the people on Justice League haven't supported Fisher, and he's gotten a mixed response on Twitter and in the news media. His allegations unlike Charisma's are vague.
He came out with them earlier in 2020, and in 2019 - but it was hard to take it seriously.
[The reason I know about most of this - is I joined The Whedon Studies Association FB group back in 2019/2020 or thereabouts in an attempt to find places that were not discussing politics or news at all. They posted the Ray Fisher allegations. And about the Nevers. They also posted most of the stuff that came out now in 2021.]
If Charisma hadn't been pulled into the investigation, and hadn't come out with her own truth - which was an ugly but vague story that had been circling around fandom since it happened in 2004 - I doubt anyone would have taken Fisher seriously. Momoa and Gail Gadot weren't enough.
What got Whedon kicked off the Nevers - was Charisma's story - which wasn't vague, followed by SMG, MT, et al. I certainly wasn't buying Fisher's allegations, no one was until Charisma spoke up.
no subject
Date: 2021-02-22 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-02-22 01:45 pm (UTC)But, there's a wealth of information on youtube right now - where you can watch past Q&A's and pick up on it being a toxic work environment with a boss, who didn't know how to direct people well. Nick Frost kind of states it in an article for the Nevers, stating, Joss is a great person, but he's a horrible director. He has no idea what he wants, yells at you, and has temper tantrums. Charisma echoes this in a Q&A that I found and watched briefly on youtube last night - where she says "Joss was relentless - we did the scene over and over and over again, and I couldn't figure out what he wanted, finally defeated and exhausted, I put my head down for the scene and said the line - and Joss was like perfect. And I felt so good because I pleased him," she turns to Marsters, "do you know what I mean?" Marsters," not really, I was never really directed by Joss. For some reason he never wanted to direct me. He'd have someone else do it. If Joss was directing - I knew I wasn't in the scene."
So, Marsters really didn't necessarily see a lot of it. Although he readily admits it was toxic and had stories he was telling for years about others along with Whedon. I mean he has a story about Buffy and the crew leaving him up on a cross for two hours - although he was perfectly comfortable up there - but no one knew that but him. Stories about bleaching his hair weekly and the consequences of that. But he also has stories from other sets that are equally toxic. He's doing a scene on Supernatural - it's in the episode with Charisma, and he's talking about it at the Q&A - and CC's jaw drops in horrified shock. She wasn't there and didn't see it. The stars of Supernatural fondle Marsters balls with their feet under the desk, while he's in close up doing the scene. He ignores them and does the take without breaking character. They bow to him as a god. Marsters by that stage was kind of used to it - it's why he charges so much on guest appearances on television series. And it's why he charged so much to appear on Angel.
It's not like the fandom didn't know - they did. We talked about it on spoiler forums since 2002.
We just assumed it was typical or practical jokes. Which to an extent it was.
I mean the fact that the crew was able to leak footage after the show aired - online - no one else was able to do that. And the footage shows how painful some of it is. They do certain scenes - fifteen to twenty times.
What we didn't know about and is harder to know what happened is the stuff that happened behind closed doors. That's a he said/she said scenario. But the rest does indicate it may have happened.
And yeah, making the allegations does result in the person getting blacklisted. "You'll never work in this town again" is truer than we might think. Showbusiness is a small town and very gossipy. The follks who spoke up in support did so because they don't care what Whedon thinks or anyone for that matter. The one's who didn't either don't want to be connected to it any longer, or do care on some level.
no subject
Date: 2021-02-24 07:39 pm (UTC)You are a cornucopia of information!
" not really, I was never really directed by Joss. For some reason he never wanted to direct me. He'd have someone else do it. If Joss was directing - I knew I wasn't in the scene."
Huh. I don't think I knew that. That's... I don't even know. Although surely he directed the flaming hands, I remember the directions. (But the point still stands.)
Marsters by that stage was kind of used to it - it's why he charges so much on guest appearances on television series. And it's why he charged so much to appear on Angel.
Yikes. I hope he had some good experiences too. :(
no subject
Date: 2021-02-24 07:54 pm (UTC)Because fans ask the same questions over and over again.
Fan: Would you bleach your hair again?
Charisma: And I can answer that for him - that would be "No"
I'm also very good at finding stuff fast and fact checking the source on the internet, because I used to license online content for electronic databases at a library reference company in the 90s and early 00s, when it was impossible to find things. Google is easy by comparison.
That's... I don't even know. Although surely he directed the flaming hands, I remember the directions. (But the point still stands.)
Charisma: What? I know he directed you - you were destroying the set in a scene he was directing in the background.
Marsters: Eh, sometimes not often. I was rarely - I remember thinking, oh episode Joss is directing? Or Joss directing today? I'm not on. I can stay home.
Charisma: He just didn't like you.
Marsters: Probably.
I think Whedon did, but it wasn't memorable? The man had years in theater - and at Juillard. He'd seen worse than Whedon.
Marsters does say in an interview that after he worked with CC on Supernatural - he was shocked by how great she was. And personable. He'd heard horrible stories about her for years - and she was nothing like that. (So, she really had a difficult experience on Buffy and Angel.)
Yikes. I hope he had some good experiences too. :(
He loved working on Smallville - apparently Tom Welling is a complete sweetheart to work with and made the set pleasant. Also, loved Runaways - so those show-runners got high marks. And he liked PS I Love You. But it's impossible to know when he's acting in these interviews and being real. I've seen him outright contradict himself.
Also he praises Whedon and the sets of Buffy and Angel, then tells you all these horror stories. Which he can laugh at now. But my god...that was not a safe set. They had Boreanze do his own stunts in Destiney, when he had damaged knee. He had to fight them to ensure he didn't hurt it even more.
no subject
Date: 2021-03-03 07:48 pm (UTC)Thank you for the tip, if I have spare time I'll make a point of looking him/them up. :)
I think Whedon did, but it wasn't memorable? The man had years in theater - and at Juillard. He'd seen worse than Whedon.
Yeah... Also, he - like ASH - was older than the main cast. I think that probably made a big difference. And someone linked me to this which shows the issues Joss had on Avengers and how his approach may not have worked as well on Big Name Actors as on his own creations. ;)
Marsters does say in an interview that after he worked with CC on Supernatural - he was shocked by how great she was. And personable. He'd heard horrible stories about her for years - and she was nothing like that. (So, she really had a difficult experience on Buffy and Angel.)
Poor CC. Also 'Difficult to work with' is clearly just a code...
But my god...that was not a safe set. They had Boreanze do his own stunts in Destiney, when he had damaged knee. He had to fight them to ensure he didn't hurt it even more.
I wish that didn't echo all kinds of other stories, but I'm reminded of Uma Thurman and Tarantino and it's clearly just the tip of the iceberg in that field of work.
/very late reply, time just disappeared
no subject
Date: 2021-03-04 12:02 am (UTC)I just stumbled on them out of boredom. Usually I'm watching some dance vid on youtube, or fanvid, and up it comes as the next thing to watch.
Youtube is very weird.
And someone linked me to this which shows the issues Joss had on Avengers and how his approach may not have worked as well on Big Name Actors as on his own creations. ;)
Yeah, I agree. It's kind of hard to bully people who are higher up the pay ladder than you are, and more important to the series. I mean Marvel/Disney most likely made it clear to Whedon that he was the least valuable player in that group. You also don't bully people like Mark Ruffalo, Chris Evans, Robert Downy Jr., Scarlette Johannsen, Sam Jackson, etc. Or Jon Faverau - Jon wrote for Obama, and is a top actor and director, and started the franchise with Iron Man. (I just finished Obama's Promised Land and he mentions him.)
I doubt he bullied the cast on Firefly - they were also more seasoned. And I can't imagine Whedon bullying someone like Nathan Fillon or Alan Tudyke. The rest, maybe. The writers? Definitely. But not Fillon or Tudyke, and doubtful on Torres. On Justice League - I doubt he bullied Henry Caville or Ben Affleck. But the other three, less seasoned actors? Definitely.
Dollhouse? Same deal. He wasn't on set that much either. But Dusku had executive producer credit. And
he had people like Harry Lennix, and seasoned actors on that series.
No, the ones that he appeared to do it on were the WB projects, with lesser known casts, and high pressure.
True on Marsters and Head. Marsters states in one Q&A that he spent a lot of time watching people whine on set of Buffy - thinking "you're fired, you're fired, fired, fired.." - he ran a theater up in Seattle for a bit. And their lack of professionalism drove him nuts. He would just sit and study the script, or play the guitar in his trailer. He didn't do any of the other antics. No pranks, nothing. Whedon said once when he was off-set, he was boring. He did his job, then he got out of the way.
But he was also 32 years of age, with over 20 years of stage acting behind him. Plus ran a theater, and struggled. He was thankful for the job. ASH - was much the same - he was in his late 30s or 40, with over 30 years of stage and screen experience. And he was older than Whedon. Both are older than Whedon. Whedon was about 26-28 when Buffy started, Marsters and ASH were in their thirties.
They would deal with him differently than someone like Charisma, or Gellar or Trachenberg would have.
Plus men.
Poor CC. Also 'Difficult to work with' is clearly just a code.
Well no. It's more complicated than that. She was late to work. She apparently had a prescription pill habit. She would get her hair cut or done without telling them and just show up. (Which is problematic - since they film scenes out of order, and you have to look consistent. Actresses on television series - need to be careful about their looks and how they change their look, same with actors. You can't just go shave your head or get a tattoo. Makeup will have to cover it. Hair will have to buy a wig or find a way to get you hair extensions. Gellar asked a long way in advance to cut hers for example. CC just blithly did it.) Also she'd sit in her trailer and not come out.
They had real issues with the actress, which unfortunately hurt her later. That doesn't excuse how Whedon handled it. But, CC wasn't completely blameless either.
Things are never black and white in these situations, unfortunately.
no subject
Date: 2021-03-07 04:26 pm (UTC)In answer to your question: Occasionally. Although if I do I'll make sure to find the early stuff.
Or Jon Faverau - Jon wrote for Obama, and is a top actor and director, and started the franchise with Iron Man. (I just finished Obama's Promised Land and he mentions him.)
I remember Jon from... 2008? That whole election was like a fandom. :)
They had real issues with the actress, which unfortunately hurt her later. That doesn't excuse how Whedon handled it. But, CC wasn't completely blameless either.
I was sort of thinking more generally (although that obviously did not come across) - how phrases might have an aspect of truth and yet become a shorthand for something else. So an actress who is 'difficult to work with' can genuinely be difficult, but it's more of a way to describe someone who is unofficially blacklisted. Like how 'economic anxiety' is used for Trump voters, or 'Wants to spend more time with his family' for a politician caught having an affair who decides to resign. Whatever their literal meaning, phrases like that come with connotations and can't be taken at face value. (We've yet to finish Bojack, but one of the story lines is about this very thing. The actress in question IS 'difficult to work with, but it's much more complex than that.) Like you say, it's never black or white.
no subject
Date: 2021-03-07 05:50 pm (UTC)It can be. Depends. Both male and female actors get that label. But some aren't black-listed because of it. Also, honestly, some of them deserve it - because they are insane idiots. My brother way back in the 1990s when he was a film major, worked with his girlfriend (who later became his wife) on one of her uncle's films. Her uncle was fixing a film that was a mess, and re-shooting various scenes. Scean Young, an actress who had managed to get the rep of being difficult was on the film. My brother said that she was just nuts. He had fill a bath tub with ice on a set with various wires and electrical equipment - so she could get into the ice cold water in order to get into character. He said she was nice enough, just impossible to work with.
Also, both Shannon Dougherty and Kathryn Heigle struggled with that rep. Dougherty couldn't get along with various female cast members on both 90210 and Charmed (she had feud with Alyssa Milano). Heigle got blacklisted by Shondra Rhimes (Heigle declined an Emmy nomination for Grey's Anatomy one year stating the writing for her character wasn't good enough for her to get the nomination) and Judd Apatow (Heigle refused to do various scenes stating they made her uncomfortable or were sexist - I'd agree with that assessment - I hated Knocked Up), both bigger names than Whedon. She did kind of rise above it though and got a lot of really good roles here and there, but had bad luck in none of them taking off. She's on a series now on Netflix.
CC unlike Heigel isn't that talented. She just doesn't have the acting chops. Also I don't think Whedon blacklisted her - so much as Fox and the WB, they were the ones who wanted her gone -so my guess is that the studios blacklisted her. When you have not one but two studios put out the word that they don't want to work with you - then you got a problem. [The actors who got television series after Buffy - all got them through contracts with television studios - notably Fox. Fox was the studio behind Buffy and Angel, and Fox owned all the rights to both shows, while WB was the distributor. Fox had development deals with Whedon, Minear, and various writers on those shows. And it had development deals with David Boreanze, Alyson Hannigan, and Eliza Dusku. The big money is in television development deals.]
Getting blacklisted by a television show-runner isn't that big a deal. Because you can avoid them. They come and go. But getting blacklisted by a studio is a problem and always has been.
You have to have a lot of talent to past that. The one's who have are movie stars. And even those... Ridely Scott erased Kevin Spacey from a movie that he was in, and replaced him with Christopher Plummer. Johnny Depp has been dropped from various films now, as has Armie Hammer. All are now on the proverbial blacklist. They got blacklisted by the audience. Mel Gibson has had similar problems.
Directors have it easier - as do writers, since they are less likely to get blacklisted by the audience. But once the audience or popular opinion blacklists you - you're dead.
Going back to CC? I remember Marsters stating how surprised he was - in an interview. He'd heard nothing but bad things about her on both Buffy and Angel, he'd never worked with her before Supernatural. And hadn't interacted with her until the conventions. He said she was a pleasure to work with on Supernatural and had no idea why she'd gotten such a bad rep. But their Supernatural gig was at least five years after Buffy/Angel had ended. And I think CC learned a lot from the previous experience. And how to deal with television direction, marks, and lines. Buffy was really just her second television series. She has thanked Gellar for teaching her how to do it on Buffy, and David for his help on Angel since they aired.
At any rate - I really think Fox and WB were the problem, not so much Whedon. Because it wasn't just Whedon who was toxic. Greenwalt was doing things he shouldn't have been doing, actually from what I understand they all were. And that's on the studio - the studio is responsible for casting, running the set, and keeping everyone safe. As are the producers. The show-runner reports to the studio.