shadowkat: (city clock)
1. Tempting but pricey: A Writers Workshop with two Writing Professors, who specialize in genre blending. The program is supposed to address craft issues common to fiction in all its forms, whether mainstream or genre. But alas, it's $575. In Brooklyn, but $575. Also, next week is going to be busy, busy, busy and people intensive at work. (Lots of traveling back and forth to Jamaica from Manhattan - which is an hour, and various meetings that I have to present stuff in, listen closely, and/or facilitate. My job is partly to run. present at, facilitate, and coordinate meetings that involve projects that I'm procuring.) So...no. And, at this point I've taken so many writing courses, I could teach a course about it. But tempting, definitely tempting.

The science fiction novel that I'm currently working on has a huge plot bunny. Or mcguffin that I'm struggling with. Read more... )

2. Saw The Robber Bridegroom today, 2pm matinee showing, which was relatively uncrowded. I got to move up five-six rows. So that I was about five to six rows from the stage.

It's a fun, interactive musical, told in the style of a tall tail and adapted from Eudora Welty's short story of the same name. Actually, Margaret Atwood used the idea in her novel, entitled The Robber Bride. Stephen Pasqual who is known mainly for various supporting television roles, portrayed the lead character, Jaime Lockhart. And the man definitely has a pair of pipes on him - he can sing, and well. So could the others, but he's really good. They had a live bluegrass band on the stage, which intermingled with the actors.

I've recently re-discovered my love of bluegrass music, so thoroughly enjoyed it. It was put on by the Roundabout Theater Company, an off-broadway, not for profit company. They put on numerous plays each season. Afterward, they were collecting funds for HIV Drive - so I gave a donation.

I wouldn't say it was great theater, but definitely worth the price of admission -- and enjoyable.

Some interesting gender metaphors and cultural metaphors on play during it. And it has fine old time poking fun at stereotypes. A bit off-color in humor, may offend a few folks out there, and definitely raunchy, but fun.

Debated getting tickets to Richard the II at BAM, with David Tennant in the lead, but alas, it's sold out - standby tickets only. And I don't have the patience or time to do standby, did that in my 20s.

Remember doing it in London - to see Phantom of the Opera, which had just opened in London. I was so disappointed by the performance, that I swore never to do it again. (We stood in line every day after class for a week. I was in London in the 1980s for a Theater Studies Program, we saw theater and wrote critical meta-reviews about it. It was mostly classical theater, Shakespeare, or 18th Century pieces. I don't think we saw anything that was modern.)

I make it a point to see at least three theatrical performances a year -- my favorite art form is live theater. I adore it to pieces, but I'm not willing to spend hours waiting in line for it any longer. Some people love live music (which is sort of wasted on me, (can never hear it properly and I found watching people standing and singing on stage boring), I love live-storytelling. It's a bone of contention between my brother and I, he adores live concerts, hates theater, I'm the exact of opposite. To me -- story and metaphor and characters are everything. We have similar differences regarding our taste in art as well - he prefers conceptual art or minimalistic abstract art, I prefer art that tells a story or conveys an emotion or feeling. Although we are similar in some ways as well, neither of us have any paintings, posters, photos, or drawings on our walls - yet we're both artists. Which my niece and parents consider odd. We also both prefer serial television series. Neither of us play video games or are into spectator sports, we watch them with ambivalence. Having a sibling feels at times like a double-edged sword, or a gift that spits in your face, repeatedly.)

3. The city is in partial bloom. Lots of flowering trees in my area, and the weeping willows in front of my apartment complex and along Ocean Parkway and Ditmas Park are quite lovely sprigs of kelly green. The areas becoming increasingly gentrified. And more populated than it was when I moved to NYC back in 1996. Today, I was once again near the vicinity of my office -- making me miss the days the office was situated in Jamaica, not in the city. Talk about culture shocks. Old office was in a run-down Carribean/Haitian neighborhood, and next door to various projects or low-rent housing. New area is rather upscale in comparison. We're next door to J Crew and across the street from Brooks Brothers. Oh, and Berkely College is just down the block. Before it was Jamaica Community College. And each Wednesday, they'd give away food to the homeless and destitute in Rufus King Park. While at the new location, it's ice skating and wine bars in Bryant Park. The homeless are studiously ignored. One young guy's been rather industrious, he's set up shop between two doorways next to Barnes and Noble. He lies on a mat, with a blanket. Sheltered underneath the awning. With a sign - I'm homeless, friendless, with no family, and no job -- please help. One day, I gave him five bucks. Now, I'm beginning to wonder why no one has moved him into a shelter. In Jamaica, they were moved into shelters. Also, he seems rather clean and well-kept for a homeless person.

The Roundabout Theater was located between 6th and 7th avenues, off of 46th street. Just a few blocks north of the fancy Grace building, which houses amongst other things, HBO Television and Film Studios. (I applied for a job there once in the licensing department, glad I didn't get it, it doesn't pay well and I'd have been bored out of my mind in a month.) Lots of fancy clothing stores on Mad Avenue and 5th, such as Brooks Brothers, Ann Taylor, Elle Tahiri, J Crew, Paul Stewart, Urban Outfitters, and Sketchers (less fancy). Not so much on 6th and 7th, which are reserved for restaurants and cultural venues, like the Steinway Piano Store. Few trees until you get to Bryant Park. It's very much the concrete and glass jungle that you've seen on television, where you feel like you are walking through a concrete canyon of buildings, various shapes, sizes and styles. But all painted gray, brown, white, and black or shades of each.

I've lived and worked around the city for so long now, that I barely notice. And zig-zagging through lots of people to get from point A to point Z is second nature to me now. It has it colorful touches for the observant - the buskers who perform underground and above ground, the clothing styles, which included today, a man walking towards me in a kilt. The various spoken languages and accents.

The city has a buzz to it, a vibrancy...that sings beneath one's feet. An energy. It can be exhausting at times. By the time I got home, which took about 45 minutes, I was exhausted. Weirdest thing, it takes about 45 minutes to get anywhere in this city, regardless of where you are coming from. It's bizarre. We used to joke about it. Took me exactly 45 minutes to get to the theater and to get home, and it was 18 stops on the subway. Straight shot on the F, thankfully. Got off in front of the HBO store.
shadowkat: (flowers)
Last night I finally saw the Tony Award Winning show Spring Awakening. I'd been listening to the original Broadway Cast album since roughly 2010 or thereabouts. But I didn't see the original production, instead I saw the critically acclaimed Deaf West's Revival of Spring Awakening, which was put on in LA and brought to Broadway for 18 weeks this year. It ends January 19.

What is Deaf West?

From the Playbill: Deaf West is an organization dedicated to bridging cultures and shifting perceptions, specifically in regards to the hearing impaired. Deaf West employs American Sign Language (ASL) Masters, who facilitate the adaptation and translation process from written English to American Sign Language. This process requires careful attention to preserving the integrity of ASL, while adhering to the script as written. In addition to executing the translation, the ASL Masters must see that it appropriately reflects the actor and the character portrayed. The ASL Masters then work with each actor to ensure that the playwright's intentions, tone, rhythm, poetry, idiomatic expressions and humor are all reflected in each actor's signing.

They did previously with The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, but in many ways, Spring Awakening lends itself far more to a Deaf theater adaptation, and having seen various videos of the previous version -- I tend to agree with various critics, surprise, surprise, that in some respects it's been improved. The sign language emphasizes the central theme of miscommunication or inability to communicate in the same language between parent and adolescent, or even between adolescents. It takes away some of the melodrama or "Broadway Burst into Song" and pulls it down to a more human and far more emotional level. There a moments of dead silence, where characters are speaking completely in sign language, with the words written slowly across the back drop in chalk white letters, that speak louder than actual words would.

Here's what the Director states about this presentation in Playbill:


In 1891, Frank Wedekind's highly controversial and socially indicting play, Fruhlings Erwachen (Spring's Awakening) was published in Germany and subsequently banned. Eleven years prior, the Second International Congress on Education of the Deaf (known as the Milan Conference) passed a resolution banning sign language in schools across Europe and the United States, declaring Oralism (lip reading, speech and mimicking mouth shapes) superior. The term given to Deaf students unable to succeed with the abusive oral method was "Failure", the same word that sends (the character) young Moritz Stiefel down his destructive path. (Stiefel fails a language course and can't be promoted.) Children were told that if they failed at speech, they failed at life. Deaf marriage was looked down upon, and the barbaric sterilization of the Deaf was commonplace. This exploration of adolescence within the context of this dark time in Deaf history serves as a haunting reminder of the perils of miseducation and miscommunication.

Though much has changed since the time of Wedekind and the Milan Conference, we still live in a world where beliefs, cultures and individuals are silenced and marginalized.


For a while now, I've been interested in the inaccessibility of art, how to communicate it to others,
and the gaps in understanding. It does not seem to matter sometimes if we all speak the same language, when we can't seem to listen, see and/or hear what is being said. Spring Awakening encompasses that better than anything I've seen in a while - showing the struggle to express love, desire, hope...to largely death or uncomprehending ears.

It blew me away. My jaw was extended through most of the performance. I found it mind-blowing. I'd never seen anything quite like it. It's one of those performances that has to be seen live, you can't make film of it or a video and capture the experience of seeing it live.

Below the cut are a few samples of Deaf West's Revival of Spring Awakening:

Read more... )

Now for comparison - a few clips from the Tony Award Winning Original Presentation of Spring Awakening:

Read more... )

It's going on tour after it leaves Broadway.
shadowkat: (Tough enuf)
Saw the Revival of Pippin last night at Music Box Theater, located between Broadway and 8th Avenue, on 45 street in Manhattan (aka to tourists NYC).

In a word? Amazing.

I don't how the choreographer did it - but somehow she managed to meld the best of Bob Fosse's grinding dance routines with cirque du soliel's acrobatics, and magic tricks. The show was a magical fest for the eyes and mind. Taking place beneath a circus tent, and heavy on metaphorical imagery and ironical lyrical twists.

It's most likely not for the metaphor blind. Although, if you are metaphor blind, you most likely will enjoy the acrobatics and the magic tricks, not to mention the comedic bits - such as the actors playing chickens in the second act, who were a hoot.

And Petina Miller is a sight to behold as the "leading player" originally portrayed by Ben Vereen in the 1970s production. The only change from the original cast - was Annie Potts as Berthe (Granny) as opposed to Andrea Martin, which worked beautifully. She does a trapeze number while singing "Time to Start Living", an audience sing-a-long number. Pippin unlike other musicals, breaks the fourth wall, the audience is to a degree an active participant. The players talk directly to the audience. And at the end of Pippin, inform the audience, that they continue to exist inside every members heads - so if you feel the need to be "extraordinary" and "have that final blaze glory", they will appear.

Best theater performance that I've seen in years - it blew me away. My jaw hung open in childish delight through 98% of it. Can't say the same about the tape of the previous production with Ben Vereen - which I found sluggish in places, and my attention often wandered. Here - while it is still a long show, my attention was always captivated by what was happening on stage and at various points they had things happen in the aisles, so it was beneficial to be in the orchestra seats. Although the things that happened in the aisles were not crucial to following the story.

The Music Box Theater by Broadway standards is not bad, you can the stage fairly well, but the seats...are cramped close together and clearly created for small people. I had an aisle seat - so was able to stick my long legs in the aisle through most of the show, the guy next to me wasn't as fortunate. Concession prices were worse than airport prices - $5.00 for a small water bottle (no you can't bring your own).

What's Pippin about? It's a sort of allegorical piece.

plot spoilers )

The book and lyrics were at first considered trite by theater critics, but Fosse's staging changed all that, as does this directors staging and arrangement. In theater - it's how the show is performed that often counts not the words on the page. Although...I have to admit I love some of the songs from Pippin. And the dance numbers, along with the circus acts and magic tricks - are quite good and do an excellent job of bringing out several of the themes. This production in some respects is more subtle than Fosse's, and more comical. It's lighter.
And a whole lot more fun.

Oh, if you ever need to find a bathroom between 44th Street and 45th Streets on 8th Avenue?
Go to the Intercontinental Hotel, elevators, B level, hang a right, to the back. Best bathrooms in Times Square. Clean. Have hand lotion. And individual booths with actual doors.
Also free. Just make sure you look decent. Actually that's the trick to bathroom hunting in big cities: find a Hotel. If you can't find one? Try a Barnes and Nobles. If you can't find that? A pub or walk-in bar. Also churches and museums. It's actually easier to find a decent bathroom in NYC than it is elsewhere, weird, but true.
shadowkat: (brooklyn)
Saw the 2011 Pulitzer Prize and 2012 Tony Award winning play Clyborne Park today. Ventured out in the 98-100 degree heat to Manhattan and spent two hours in an air-conditioned theater watching the play. Had good seats, second row from the stage, literally at the corner of it. They were too close. In the future, I'm going to try for something a bit further back and further towards the center.

The play by Bruce Norris is written in response to Lorraine Hansberry's award winning play A Raisin in the Sun which was adapted into a movie, a film for television, and a musical. Both plays are based on Hansberry's family's experience moving into a neighborhood in the Washington Park division of Chicago back in 1934, as described in the famous US Supreme Court Case: Hansberry v. Lee .

Here's a quote from Lorraine Hansberry regarding the court case in her book To Be Young, Gifted, and Black

25 years ago, [my father] spent a small personal fortune, his considerable talents, and many years of his life fighting, in association with NAACP attorneys, Chicago’s ‘restrictive covenants’ in one of this nation's ugliest ghettos. That fight also required our family to occupy disputed property in a hellishly hostile ‘white neighborhood’ in which literally howling mobs surrounded our house… My memories of this ‘correct’ way of fighting white supremacy in America include being spat at, cursed and pummeled in the daily trek to and from school. And I also remember my desperate and courageous mother, patrolling our household all night with a loaded German Luger (pistol), doggedly guarding her four children, while my father fought the respectable part of the battle in the Washington court."

A Raisin in the Son focuses on the fictional Younger family in 1969, stand-in's for the Hansberry's with Karl Lindger, a minor white character, attempting to bribe them into selling their dream house to the Community Board who would in turn sell it to a "white family". Clyborne Park focuses on two time periods. The first act takes place in 1969, when Bev and Russ are selling their house to a black family, fed-up with the callousness of their community in regards to the tragic suicide of their son. Karl Lindger, a major character in this play, comes forward with his "deaf" and pregnant wife, to talk them out of it. And asks their maid, Francine, to support him in his claim. The second act which takes place in 2009, shows the house in a state of disrepair and in the process of being demolished and renovated to fit the needs of an upper-middle class white couple moving into the neighborhood. In this act, Lena, the great niece of the Younger family, petitions to stop the renovations and demolition of the building. The act is a meeting between Lena, her husband Keith, Lindsey, Steve, their attorney Kathy, and the Community Board rep/lawyer Tom.

On its face the play appears to be about the house or the fight over the house. But it's really not. What it is about is far more complicated. I'd say its about racism, but that's also a simplistic answer. What the play does delve into is the why of it. At its heart is a power play...and the driving force of that power play is the fear of change, first from the white neighbors, and then from the black community board. And the racial politics that drive those fears. This is where it is very different from A Raisin in the Son - which is a story about a family, Clyborne Park is a story about politics, about stereotypes, about how we inadvertently hurt each other through assumptions and how we exclude people because they aren't like us.

It is also a comedy. There are some laugh-out loud moments. Outrageous, irreverent, humor that can give South Park and Avenue Que a run for its money. Unlike both, I'd say the play has more to say and digs at deeper themes. It addresses head-on the dicey topic of gentrification and segregation, along with race-class wars - as seen in 1969 and today.
The more things change, Norris seems to state, the more certain things - how humans respond to change and to each other for example - stay the same.

The lines from A Raisin in the Sun which inspired Clyborne Park are these:

Mama: Course I don't want to make it sound fancier than it is...It's just a plain little old house - but it's made good and solid - and it will be ours. Walter Lee - it makes a difference in a man when he can walk on floors that belong to him..
Ruth: Where is it?
Mama: Well - well- it's out there in Clybourne Park

If you ever get a chance to see this play, do. It will haunt me for a very long time.
Like A Raisin in The Sun before it - it's the sort of play that changes you, makes you aware of things that you weren't aware of before or didn't really think about. I can't tell you that all the characters were likable, they aren't. But some are compelling.
And the play does make one think.
shadowkat: (Default)
Went to urgent care this morning to get antibotics to deal with my chronic cough - which instead of getting better, has gotten worse, dang it. Got the dreaded antiboitics and cough syrup (laced with codeine) and came home. So today was fairly low-key. (I type as I hack. Hate chest coughs.)

Yesterday, we wandered about Beaufort, SC which has changed a great deal. Not one but two of our beloved book stores have closed. One was in an old firehouse. They want to put a restaurant or bar in it, as if they don't have enough already. But we had a nice gumbo at the historic Plums, a rollicking laid-back seafood joint, and candy cane ice cream at an old fashioned ice cream parlor. Well, I had the candy cane ice cream (because peppermint ice cream is my fav), Momster had chocolat and Popster Vanilla/Orange Sorbet. And we took a quite stroll along the Broad River, which included sitting in a wooden swing, just soaking in the sunshine. It was a lovely day - in the mid-sixities. Once we returned home, I sat outside for a bit and read.

Tuesday - we saw the musical Hello Dolly. review of Hello Dolly )

Am charging up the old Kindle, so taking a break from the page-turner that Catching Fire book two of Suzanne Collins' The Hunger Games triology has become. I rather like the new characters - Finnick and Johanna, and Beetee.

vague spoilers for Catching Fire )
shadowkat: (Default)
Ten years ago, I saw the Stephen Daldry film Billy Elliot in the theater. Loved it enough to purchase the soundtrack - and well because it had "London Calling" by the Clash and Cosmic Dancer by T Rex on it. It won three oscars in 2000 - best director, best writing, and best supporting actress - Julie Waters who plays the dance instructor.

Several years later in 2009, Daldry, Elton John and Lee Hall brought the story to Broadway, where it won ten tony awards including best musical.

The story is simple - it's about a thirteen year old working class miner's boy who falls in love with the ballet during the biggest and longset strike in British History, circa 1984. The story deals with in-bred prejudices regarding the arts, the need for hope, class issues, and social justice in working class England during the 1980s.

Here's the historical note in the playbill: In 1984, the British National Union of Mineworkers (The NUM) went on strike to save the coal industry from the threatened closures of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who was politically opposed to state-owned industry and determined to crush the unions.

The strike went on for one year. The miner's families had to survive on handouts from other working people who supported their stand. But by employing riot police to intimidate their communities, and importing coal from Eastern Europe, the unions were broken. Over the subsequent ten years, the Conservative government dismantled the entire industry.

The story of Billy Elliot takes place in the coal fields of Northern England where mining has been the major employer for hundreds of years. In 1984 more than 300,000 men worked in the mining industry,today there are less than 1000. More than 98 percent of coal used for British energy is now imported from abroad.


(Gee, certainly explains the hatred many of the unemployed mining working class families in Wales had towards Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. Can't say I blame them. My aunts identified because they live in the mining communities of Eastern Pennsylvania, otherwise known as the Poconos. They've seen similar issues up close and personal.)

The musical does a fantastic job of interweaving Billy's pursuit of dance and the strike. There's a particularly moving scene of Billy dancing against the strike brigade, and another of the riot police, strikers and little girl ballerinas, including Billy all dancing amoungst each other, the girls in the middle and the two opposing parties on either side, yet they trade hats as they sing, until it becomes muddled and you see the two parties from a child's pov. The whole tale is told from a 13 year old boy's perspective.

Other stand-out performances include a dance number with Billy's best friend Michael - who dresses up in women's clothing and they sing a song with a bunch of huge dresses about individuality.

Much like the movie it ends on a somber yet at the same time uplifting note, and the dance numbers are amazing, far more striking and memorable than the songs. Well, with the possible exception of Merry Christmas Mrs. Thatcher (a comical political piece with puppets) and Born to Boogie.
There's one number in particular that blew me away, Billy and an adult version of himself, dance with a spinning chair.

The musical is on tour now across the country and abroad, if you get the chance to see it, do, it's an uplifting story about hope in times where no hope appears to be on the horizon and banding together. It is also a story about how the arts can enrich our lives, uplift us. Plus, you can take the entire family. One of the few musicals I've seen that I can say that about. Oh sure, there's some foul language, but kids hear that on the street and at recess.

Overall rating? B+
shadowkat: (Shadow -woman)
On Tuesday night, my parents took me to the musical The Drowsy Chaperone, which was playing at the relatively new Marquis theater located inside the Marriot hotel on Broadway. The Marquis is amongst the better theaters that I've been inside of, Studio 64 being amongst the worst. It has more leg room than most, fairly comfortable seats, and excellent accoustics. Of course we were only five rows from the stage, with orchestra seats. I was with my folks - if I was seeing it with friends or by my lonesome, I'd be in nosebleed territory otherwise known as the far reaches of the upper Mezzaine. Having had seats up there, I can tell you the experience is quite different. In fact, it would be better to see the show on tv than see it in the Mezzaine. Why? Unless the theater has great accoustics or is small enough -you can't hear most of the words or lyrics. If the seats aren't sloped or staggered, you don't see much either. Live theater much like live concerts is better the closer you are to the stage. When you sit at the back, you are basically watching and listening to the audience as much as if not more than the performance. I've done this, each time, I am disappointed and a bit annoyed that I've spent 35 to 55 bucks, with my knees cramped up to my chin, peering over heads, and craning my neck to see and hear a bunch of people far below me on the stage. In today's world - seeing a play or musical from a decent vantage point is reserved for students with discounts and/or contacts or the absurdly wealthy. You think I'm joking? Here's the prices of orchestra seats in most of the theaters around town: 110-150 dollars. It cost a friend of mine, $900 to take four people to see the new Tom Stoppard play. Wicked? 175 dollars a ticket. Jersey Boys? 120. And don't talk to me about Spring Awakening - you can't even get seats according to the people chatting behind us.

At any rate this is a rather lengthy explanation as to why I only see theater, good theater, when my parents decide to visit me in NYC, splurge on it and take me along for the ride. My parents are theater buffs - they see about five to ten shows a year in Hilton Head, many as good if not better than what you might see on Broadway not to mention a heck of a lot cheaper - I think orchestra seats cost maybe thirty to fifty bucks there. Growing up? We saw at least two or three plays or musicals a year, went to the ballet, and if they'd been into opera and had the money - gone to that too. But, alas, they did not get into opera until they hit their dotage and actually had the money to afford it - so my brother and I managed to skip out on that cultural experience. I've only seen one opera live - Carmen. And I've seen two versions of it, one at the National Opera Company in Convent Gardens London (which I've forgotten the name of because it was way back in 1987) and one at a local high school in Lawrence, Kansas, neither was very good. The best might have been the high school version - which is saying something. (It wasn't just me, opera fanatics hated the London version.) My brother hates plays and musicals - he prefers rock concerts or live musical performances. So he didn't come.

The Drowsy Chaperone was not at all what I expected. I suggested it to my parents, because the music and style of the play fit what interested them. Jazz and big band tunes with a curmudgenly host giving bits and pieces of commentary. I did not expect to enjoy it as much as I did. I expected it to be sweet, a little funny, and to forget it soon afterward. Much like Dirty Rotten Scoundrels and Hairspray.

It is unlike any play or musical I have ever seen. And as result hard to describe. The story is about a man who is sitting alone in his NYC studio apartment, complete with drop down bed and old style refrigerator. It is November and he's feeling sort of blue. So he puts on a favorite show tune album, one that he has listened to numerous times, but never ever seen performed. He'd gotten it from his mother - it had been her favorite. It's different, he tells the audience that he imagines sits just beyond him, than the musicals on today. It's sunnier, shorter, less politically correct, and in some ways more comforting even with its considerable flaws - all of which he points out during the show apologetically and at times snarkily. The record has been played so many times that it skips in places and he has to stop it. Or he will have it interrupted by a phone ringing, and scream at the phone to stop, just so he can escape a bit longer into his fantasy. There's even a place on the recording - that has been garbled and he has become obsessed with to the point of distraction. He's replayed this portion millions of times. It concerns one line of dialogue, a piece of advice, that the Drowsey Chaperone gives her young charge, Janet, regarding marriage. Does she say "Leave while you can? Or is it Live while you can?" He's not certain.

The musical is not so much a musical as a musical within a one-man play. Oh the muscial has numerous actors, sets, songs, and dance numbers - but both the audience and the characters in it are clearly inside the narrator's head.

Watching it moved me to laughter and tears, because I identified with it. As I think anyone would who has ever been obsessed or devoted to a book, a record, a tv show or a movie or a play to the point that they spend time endlessly looking at it, turning it over, analyzing, criticizing, writing fanfic on it, and discussing with others.

It's a story about the escape into that fantasy world. The cost of escaping into it. And to a degree the benefits. How escaping to that world acts as a weird sort of drug. But that's not all it is about - at the same time, it operates as a deft satire of the present state of musical theater and live performance. There are throw-away lines about how the comical impersonations of foreign personnages have been banned from adult theater and relegated to children's theater and cartoons run by Disney, or the pyro-tech of shows such as Miss Saigon aren't really much more advanced than the Busby Berkley numbers of yester-year. How a cell phone or even an intermission will destroy the moment - the moment when you are transported inside another world outside of this one, one that is comfortable and happy and makes you smile. The silliness of certain scenes. How a lovely tune can be almost destroyed by inane and almost laughable lyrics.

If there's a theme - it is symbolized by a rousing tune sung by the Drowsy Chaperone, the dipsy half-drunk chaperon to the heroine in the musical the man in the chair has described for us. "Stumbling Along Life's Highway" it is called or something to that effect. About how all we can do is stumble along and hope somehow, someway we will come out okay. An anthem that cheers the man in the chair, who is weighted down by his lonliness, yet at the same time too comfortable within it to take action and seek out others. The best he can do is talk to the audience in his head that never answers back.

I saw the musical on Tuesday and it haunts me still. It feels post-modernist in structure, with multiple layers. The satirical comedy at the top, with somewhat bittersweet metaphysical one just underneath. Who is real, one wonders at the end of it. The audience, the man in the chair, or the musical. Each world sits outside the next. At the end, only at the very end, do the three merge, the actors in the musical notice the man in the chair and his world and invite him inside theirs to escape it. Then they all bow to the audience. You'd think that was the end, but it's not. Not quite. The last bit before the curtain falls is the man sitting back in his chair, reading a book, escaping into yet another world.

The Drowsy Chaperonee walked away with mulitple Tony's and Outer Circle Critics Awards when it premiered in 2006, shocking the theater elite. It took Tony's for best music and lyrics, score, set design, as well as many other categories including one for the actress portraying The Drowsey Chaperone.

If you ever get the chance to see this gem, I highly recommend it. Even if you don't like musicals very much. It is that perfect satire, one that loves the item that it pokes fun at while commenting on it at the same time, telling us a little bit more about ourselves in the process.
Page generated May. 15th, 2025 10:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »