shadowkat: (chesire cat)
[personal profile] shadowkat
I was going to respond to all the comments to the Buffy comics poll that I created last week, but was overwhelmed. Will state this, love them or hate them, people are certainly still passionate about the comic books and Buffy.

Anyhow, the results of the Buffy Comics Reading Poll were rather interesting, not to mention the most responses I've ever received to a poll. 79 people responded to the poll, which is a fairly good sample of the portion of the Buffy fandom that I've interacted with, both in the past, and currently.
I was hoping for a bit more than that, to be honest, but did not really expect to get more than 30 at the most. If I'd gotten less than 50, I would not be doing a meta.

Of the 79 that responded?

81% have read the comic books.

Of the portion that had read the comics: 88.6% have bought the comic books. (11.4% did not - from the comments, the 11.4% that did not buy them either downloaded the file online, read the comic in the store, or got it from a friend or relative.)

50.7% of those that have read the books are still reading them.
49.3% gave up.

Of the 50.7% that is still reading:

only 25.5% are enjoying them. 43.6% are unsatisfied/ambivalent and waiting to see what happens with Twilight or the arc in general. From the comments, Twilight appears to be the only reason the 43.6% are still reading the comics. That and to see if Spike ever shows up, although many of them really hope he doesn't because they no longer trust the writer/writers to be faithful to their favorite characters. A few are hanging in there out of general curiousity - to see where Whedon takes the story and how he manages to fit it with the Fray universe.

30.9% hate the comics.

Their reasons range from a dissatisfaction over how the characters have been portrayed to how the setting, world, and general storyline has unfolded. The inaccuracies regarding Europe, Tibet, and specifically England were cited as major points of contention. (eg. In No Future For You the depiction of England as something out of a 19th century Harlequin romance novel or X-men comic book annoyed several people. The fact that everyone outside the US was shown as being in pre-modern times or barbarabic - such as the steam engine train in Germany (Germany by the way is miles ahead of the US regarding rail technology - they have trains that can rival a jet engine, stream lined, and beautiful, safe, and environmentally compliant. Europe is actually more advanced in some respects than the US, specifically in regards to trains and electronic hybrids. The US is actually behind the rest of the world in health care and transportation advancements.) )

Now this surprised me, because it turns out that we were wrong in our speculation of what turned people off of the comic books.

Of the 49.3% that stopped reading:

33.3% stopped at The Long Way Home - the first arc of the series. They tried the comics, and found they did not like them. End of story. They did not comment or if they did, that was the general sentiment.

26.7% stopped at Retreat - they commented on why they stopped at this point, stating the either the plot stopped making sense or they had just gotten bored and no longer cared.

20% stopped at Wolves at the Gate - they didn't comment on why.

10% stopped at No Future for You - they stated that the setting was handled in an offensive manner and the characterizations did not work for them.


Regarding the canon question?

45.9% said the comics are not canon. 14.9% stated that only the Buffy comics were canon. While 21.6% stated that the Buffy and Angel comics are.
Most people did not care and ignored the question - there's something to be said for that I think.

Personally, I think we should all just agree that the Buffy comics are how Joss Whedon would continue the story without actors, networks, and budgetary concerns associated with network television, and leave it at that. Because that is actually a "factual" assessment of the situation, upon which everyone should be able to agree. The need to put a lable on it, while understandable, is hardly necessary. For short hand - just say "Joss Whedon's canon" or the canon according to Joss Whedon or JWC or JW canon. Just a suggestion.

On all the other questions? About 50% of the 79 who responded, answered them. The ones who didn't stated in the comments that they either weren't interested, did not care for the rest of the poll, it did not pertain to them, or they thought the questions were stupid. (Most were fairly polite about it and kept their reasons to themselves.)

Here's the results in case you are at all curious:

1.Xander/Dawn relationship - 12.3% liked the pairing. 67.7% could care less or were ambivalent, i.e. bored. And 20% disliked it with a fiery passion (I'm guessing B/X shippers? But I could be wrong, wouldn't be the first time.). (Xander/Dawn shippers get to call themselves a beleaugered minority from this point forward, with Joss Whedon as their president (Whedon's idea) and Nick Brendan as their nemesis (he apparently hated the pairing).)

2. Character people most want to reappear? (This got quite a bit of traffic in the comments.)

Spike got 42.6% of the vote. So he wins. Dru was a distant second with 9%.
According to the comments, those who want Spike to reappear, basically want the same thing I do, closure. And they are curious as to how Whedon sees Spike in Buffy's journey.
Those who do not want to see Spike reappear or are deeply ambivalent - fear how Whedon and Dark Horse will write the character or resolve the situation. Then there's a third group, who believes that the character would ruin the comics much as he did the tv series and the comics should only be about Buffy. (Which begs the question, are you reading these comics? Because I'm not seeing all that much of "Buffy" in them, to be honest.)

3. The lamest Character to appear or Character whose reappearance we could have done without, award goes to:

Warren with a whopping 71.9% of the vote. Highest to date in the extraneous and somewhat meaningless fun question category. (So, Warren shippers? Or Warren/Amy shippers? From hereon out, you are officially a beleagured minority. I got one or two comments that actually liked Warren's reappearance and seemed a bit put-out with the rest of us, can't say I blame them.)
The one's who disliked Warren's presence - stated his reappearance took them out of the story, broke their suspension of disbelief and more or less ruined the gravity of Season 6, Willow's actions and the arc. If Willow didn't actually kill Warren with the skinning what was the point?

4. Best pairings?

Giles and Faith win by 37.7%. No one else came close. Buffy/Satsu was 13.1%. What was interesting about these results and sort of ironic is that people stopped reading the comics during or because of the issues each of those ships appeared in. Not that that means they disliked the pairings.

(And yes I know I should have included Xander/Dracula - but I had managed to delete that ship from my memory banks, so didn't think of it. Just as I should have included Buffy/Fray - which I sort of liked, but forgotten. Doesn't matter - only 5 people picked the other category, so clearly the vast majority of responders forgot about them too.)

5. Who do you hope/think Twilight is?

Note I put hope in there - because at this point I don't think there are any clear clues to the guy's identity. There's a couple of people I think that I could fanwank - Giles, Hank Summers, Xander, Buffy, Willow, and Ethan Raine. I was tempted to list Tara as an option, but ran out of options. That's the reason I didn't put "I don't care" as an option because I ran out of options. Those nasty lj programmers limit the number of options you can list.

There really wasn't any clear winner in this category, so I'm guessing most people don't care or don't have a clue. Which means the Twilight secret identity story ain't working for the audience, I suspect. Or at least the portion that responded to the poll - which is really all I care about at this point. (shrugs)

Xander got 18.2%
Someone we've never seen got 14.5%
Some subsidiary character 16.4%
Other 10.9% (these are the folks who did not care and answered the question)

No one explained why they picked Xander as the winner - but I can guess. If it were Xander - that would hurt Buffy the most. It would be the biggest twist and be the most shocking.
Also, I'm guessing part of this could well be a reactionary response to the Xander vs. Spike wars that many of the commentators mentioned. Apparently there are a few Xander fans in the comics fandom who are getting off on bashing Spike and Spike fans, even though Spike has yet to appear in the comics and if he does, will probably do so briefly much as OZ has. Sigh.

I don't think Twilight is Xander. But I could be wrong. I think Twilight is either someone we haven't seen or Giles. I hope he's Hank Summers - but I'm in the beleaguered minority on that score.

6. Best Comic or Preference?

(And yes, I know, I left off - hate all of them. But I figured that was already answered above. One repetitive question was more than enough. Apologies for the one, by the way.)

No true leader here either. Buffy comics were ahead by a smidgen of a percentage point.

Buffy - 38.6%
Spike -35.1%
Angel and Spike -10.5%

I'd say this was a case of Spuffy, except notably it was not Buffy and Spike comics that they preferred. It was an either/or scenario.

The fandom is in other words, split down the middle on this issue. In the comments section, quite a few people made a point of stating that while they loved the Spike comics - they loved them because they knew they weren't meant to be a continuation of the tv series by Whedon or what they would define as canon. (Which I found fascinating. So if they were meant to be part of the series or Whedon was behind them? You'd not like them? Hate to tell you this, but Whedon read them, told Minear this is exactly how he sees Spike and loves it to pieces - that's why he gave Lynch all his notes for the Spike movie and Angel After the Fall - he felt Lynch could do it justice based on the Lynch Spike comics.) Others stated they only liked whatever was written by Whedon or controlled by Whedon and ignored everything else. They felt that Angel After the Fall wasn't Whedon's canon, because they'd like to think Whedon would write Angel less flatly than Lynch apparently did. [I don't know, I saw the character as straight-up noir hero, which is pretty much how Whedon described him in his last question on the topic, and written flatly and portrayed flatly in the tv series. So, I'm guessing you'd be disappointed in Whedon's take and more or less already got it? ]

Thank you for taking the poll, sorry wasn't able to respond to the comments. Time has gotten away from me. Off to make dinner before it gets much later.

Date: 2009-11-30 01:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
well I don't see how Xander can be Twilight: we see Xander w/the slayers (and even kissing Dawn) at the same time that Twilight is discussing how the battle is going w/skinless Warren & Amy. If they do make Xander into Twilight then they will need to spend quite a bit of time showing how he manages to get over enemy lines many many times during the battle. I think resurrecting Ethan Raynes would make more sense, but I'm kinda hoping they don't pull that.... (of course being obviously dead is always good cover for being a masked man I guess, I mean it was good enough for the Lone Ranger).

Date: 2009-11-30 07:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] londonkds.livejournal.com
I think the assumption is that Twilight is a version of Xander from a bad potential future.

Date: 2009-11-30 05:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Yep. The view is that it is an alternate universe or alternate timeline Xander...not the Xander we see standing there.
Which isn't really that emotionally devastating from my perspective...but then time-travel/alt universe tricks tend to bore me - seen too many of them. Marvel seemed to do them all the bloody time. So did Star Trek. ;-)

Date: 2009-11-30 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
Wow, it never for a second crossed my mind that Joss would decided to do something so lame... I will be disgusted if that IS the solution to the Twilight identity question...

Date: 2009-11-30 07:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Well, he did state that he learned everything he needed to know from Terminator and Terminator Judgement Day flicks...which indicates that he could potentially do it.

Right there with you by the way...I find the time travel loop hole a bit lame and a tad lazy from both a viewer's and a writer's perspective. You get to have your cake and eat it too - ie. the huge nasty villian being a trusted friend, but not losing the trusted friend b/c hello they come from an alternate timeline...aka VampWillow so really don't count. (Sort of like what he did in Dopplegangland...which worked quite well actually, and I loved - but it was also just one episode and not the big bad of the entire season.) If Whedon does it? I'm done.

Date: 2009-11-30 07:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
Yeah Dopplegangland didn't seem lame/cheap because he had set it up with Cordelia's wish to Anya in 'The Wish'... the reason for the alternate universe was already accepted, and exploring it further was really cool.
But to use an AU as the solution to the two year long story arc of Season 8 really would not be cool at all (and would take some major tap dancing to even manage being lame...).

I refuse to believe that Joss ever considered such a thing for BtVS S8 . I'm expecting something very clever, something I do not see coming, something worthy of this extremely long build up!
lol
From: [identity profile] embers-log.livejournal.com
This cover has been released for March 2010 BtVS S8:
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b4/embers_log/miscellaneous%20pics/comic%20book%20art/ObamaasTwilight.jpg
(but don't worry, it is only a joke.... I think)
lol

Date: 2009-11-30 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com
If I'm doing my math right only 1 in 8 people like the comics (one half still reading and only a quarter of them actually liking). I grant you sample selection bias up the wazoo, but that's smaller than I expected even given the sample selection bias.

Date: 2009-11-30 05:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Was surprised as well...from what I can tell, you are correct - factoring in sampling error and selection bias - it appears that only 1 in 8 are enjoying these things, in contrast to the series - where it was closer to 6 in 8 or thereabouts. (And here, I was thinking I was in the beleagured minority, turns out - not so much.)

Granted, based purely on the comments, part of this may very well be due to the art and medium. Comics like tv shows are visual mediums - so their success is equally dependent on how the actors perform the characters, production, sets, etc...comics are dependent on how the artist renders the writers vision. If the audience can't abide the art or cannot relate to how the artist renders it - you've lost them. Same deal with tv - if the audience cannot relate to the actress or actors playing the parts, you've lost them. You can be the best writer in the world - if they don't like how it is visualized - you have a problem. I think to a degree this is the problem Dollhouse had (a lot of viewers could not relate to Eliza Dusku's performance as Echo). I deliberately left the whole art thing off the poll because I've grown weary of the Angel art vs. Buffy art debates, although people still felt the need to comment on it for some reason. ;-)


Date: 2009-11-30 09:23 am (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
they loved them because they knew they weren't meant to be a continuation of the tv series by Whedon or what they would define as canon. (Which I found fascinating. So if they were meant to be part of the series or Whedon was behind them? You'd not like them?

Since I was one of the people who said that (have not checked back to see if anyone else felt the same), thought I should explain further that the reason why Lynch's Spike books not being 'canon' (to use that horrible word again) increased my enjoyment of them was because there was no one breathing down my neck insisting I had to accept what happened in them as canon. It's all part and parcel of the 'canon' debate, which irritates me no end. I like your definition because it differentiates nicely between the show and the comics which, IMO, bear little resemblance to each other.

I think Twilight is either Xander or Giles, for the reason you state. Those are the only two candidates for the role whose unveiling would have any emotional impact whatsoever on Buffy, given that we've been told by Allie that Angel and Spike are out of the picture.

They felt that Angel After the Fall wasn't Whedon's canon, because they'd like to think Whedon would write Angel less flatly than Lynch apparently did. [I don't know, I saw the character as straight-up noir hero, which is pretty much how Whedon described him in his last question on the topic, and written flatly and portrayed flatly in the tv series. So, I'm guessing you'd be disappointed in Whedon's take and more or less already got it? ]

Whedon indeed said that in his Humanist Society speech. However, he's also said that he thinks Angel works best as a character when he's being petty. There was precious little sign of that side of Angel's character in A: AtF. He was always right about everything and all his morally dubious decisions were either swept under the rug or justified in a very superficial way, and that's not the Angel I remember from the show. If he'd been like that, I don't think I could have got through 5 seasons of AtS.

Edited Date: 2009-11-30 09:25 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-11-30 05:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
that the reason why Lynch's Spike books not being 'canon' (to use that horrible word again) increased my enjoyment of them was because there was no one breathing down my neck insisting I had to accept what happened in them as canon. It's all part and parcel of the 'canon' debate, which irritates me no end.

Oh. That makes a lot sense, actually, and explains one of the many reasons I enjoyed them more than either the Angel After the Fall or Buffy comics. I didn't have to get into this endless and aggravating debate every time I reviewed the blasted things over - are they canon? aren't they canon? (sigh, so don't care). But I included the question more or less out of curiousity (wanted to see how many other people found it irritating and did not care - which apparently was the vast majority. That actually surprised me. From all the debates I've gotten into over the last year - I expected to see the opposite. Apparently the canon folks are a rather vocal and passionate minority.)

think Twilight is either Xander or Giles, for the reason you state. Those are the only two candidates for the role whose unveiling would have any emotional impact whatsoever on Buffy, given that we've been told by Allie that Angel and Spike are out of the picture.

Allie actually said that about Angel and Spike? Did not know that one. But makes sense...if they are used at all, it will be sparingly and Twilight is a major character. If I were Whedon - I'd do a brief two panel or four panel resolution of the Spike/Buffy story reminiscent of the resolution of the Faith/Wood in No Future, and Buffy/Angel in Chosen. Quick, to the point, with the option that maybe someday things will be different. That would more or less put the question to rest. But Whedon likes to leave the weirdest things unanswered, while hammering us endlessly over the head with stuff that we already know.

At any rate, I agree - there's three people that would upset Buffy if they were Twilight and that fit this whole female empowerment/Daddy issues/gender issues theme that Whedon has been building - her own father,
Giles (surrogate father) and Xander (best boy or guy who hung with her no matter what, sidekick).

If I were Whedon - I'd go with the disposable character that he doesn't have to explain through bizarre magic or time shifts. But it would have less emotional impact for the audience, not necessarily less for Buffy but definitely less for his readers. (although according to the poll - there was a sizable portion of readers who would prefer that Twilight was no one important and no one we knew - don't understand that...but mileage varies). But considering we've already done bizarre magic and timeshifts...anything is possible. (I don't think it is Xander - more likely Giles. But I could argue both.)


There was precious little sign of that side of Angel's character in A: AtF. He was always right about everything and all his morally dubious decisions were either swept under the rug or justified in a very superficial way, and that's not the Angel I remember from the show.

Hmmm, see I didn't see it that way when I read the comics. I saw Angel depicted as a big doofus who kept screwing up royally, and Gunn as a neat metaphor for Angel's boundless ego. There's a whole gag about Angel being jealous of Spike's relationship with his son. And Angel gets his son killed, gets Illyria turned into a monster, and everyone else to boot - then his big sacrifice is not for humanity, not for anyone else, but to bring back his son. And he's clearly responsible for what happened to Gunn - by going after the dragon, who he calls Cordelia. He ironically comes out of it this big hero. But he knows he's not, he's a big doofus and he has to deal with what happened to Gunn and the fact that Gunn's acts are representative of his own...the egotistical hero who believes he's chosen to save the day. ;-)










Date: 2009-12-01 12:31 pm (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
Apparently the canon folks are a rather vocal and passionate minority.

On LJ anyway. On Whedonesque they appear to be the majority.

Allie actually said that about Angel and Spike?

He did say something at a panel at a recent comics convention that pretty much came across as the web comic being all we get of Spike and Angel. I'm 99% certain we won't see them again, though it's possible that one, or both, of them may get another indirect mention, like Dark Willow saying to Fray about how the most important men in Fray's and Buffy's lives were 'lurks'.

As far as Joss not bookending Spuffy the way he did Faith/Wood, I can only think it's for marketing reasons. He may see both Spuffy and Bangel as over and done with, but I think he understands that both 'ships still have major pulling power (or as major as it can still be since the show is long dead) and for that reason will leave them both open-ended. The trouble with that is when you have other people like Allie and Jeanty and whoever it was who wrote that Buffy's dream issue blundering in. To a man, they seem to prefer Bangel to Spuffy and so Spuffy gets short shrift (or no mention at all) from them, and for the most part, they have no idea what they say affects anyone.

And he's clearly responsible for what happened to Gunn - by going after the dragon, who he calls Cordelia. He ironically comes out of it this big hero

I wish I could see it that way, but unfortunately I've been involved in too many conversations with Brian Lynch where he's made it pretty plain he doesn't see it ironically at all, but just as what it is. Angel is a big hero and he isn't to blame for anything that happened, and he's all redeemed now. Plus, the shanshu is definitely his. Our most recent conversation on the subject was caused by me puzzling over why Spike was depicted as being so sad when he realised he wasn't really Angel in that two-parter set at the sci-fi convention. Lynch said Spike was sad because he sees Angel as a white knight and he wants to be one too.

Date: 2009-12-01 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
On LJ anyway. On Whedonesque they appear to be the majority.

one of the many reasons I currently ignore and avoide whedonesque. ;-)

the whole canon thing gives me a headache. But I hear Star Trek is worse.


whoever it was who wrote that Buffy's dream issue blundering in.

Long-time marvel scribe Jeff Loeb. The guy who ruined Heroes.


Lynch said Spike was sad because he sees Angel as a white knight and he wants to be one too.

That doesn't mean Angel is a hero to Lynch. I mean, I'd say the same thing about Spike and I don't think of Angel as a hero. That's Spike's perception. Nor does it mean that Spike isn't a hero, just that Spike doesn't perceive himself as a hero - which makes sense, Spike has a lot of bravado, but he tends to think poorly of himself, while Angel thinks he's the cat's pajamas or all that - that the world revolves around him. Angel's the one with the big giant ego, Spike's the one with the bravado...who surprises everyone by his heroic actions, while we expect Angel to be the hero because Angel tells us over and over and over again he is.

If Lynch thought of Angel as the big hero - he would not have done what he did with Gunn. Gunn again is the mirror image of Angel in the comics.
Big giant ego - convinced he's the hero, convinced the shanshue is his, and everyone else is too..but look between the lines? Everyone and I mean everyone that Angel friends or loves is either killed, turned into a monster, or defeated in a horrible way. White Knight's in noir are well not really White Knight's.

It's ironic Spike wants to be Angel, wants to be a hero like Angel - when the comics demonstrated that Spike was actually the more selfless of the two and the hero. He saved those people, without getting recognition. He didn't battle all the monsters and put them in jeopardy. He joined and helped Angel, to help Illyria and Angel. (I'm talking about After the Fall - haven't picked up part two of the Spike-Angel comic as of yet, so can't comment directly on it.) The irony is the more heroic of the two, doesn't see himself as heroic, and the least heroic thinks he's the big giant hero and so does everyone else. Just as it is ironic that he wants the shanshu, but if he got it, he wouldn't want it...he always hates it when he gets it.
That's the noir verse. But I guess perception varies and we all read what we want to into it...(shrugs).
At any rate if you are right - than Angel isn't an noir comic, but just a straight hero comic, which I admit is rather boring. But I haven't been seeing that except in the Kelly Armstrong comics - which I avoided as unreadable.


Date: 2009-12-01 10:29 pm (UTC)
shapinglight: (Default)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
Long-time marvel scribe Jeff Loeb. The guy who ruined Heroes.

Ah. That could well explain a lot.

Have to say, I do think that Lynch sees Angel as a straight-up hero and that that's how he wrote him. However, the new writer on the book, Bill Willingham, could well be a whole different kettle of fish. I'm looking forward to seeing what he does.

Date: 2009-12-01 11:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowkat67.livejournal.com
Hee, I'm not. I've read Willingham's Fables. Or tried to. Have decided to give up on the Angel series and only read Lynch's Spike comics from hereon out.
But I will eagerly read your reviews...and maybe leaf through them to see if I change my mind.

Date: 2009-12-02 01:33 pm (UTC)
shapinglight: (comic book spike with chain)
From: [personal profile] shapinglight
Must admit, there are certain aspects of Fables that trouble me, and if any of those aspects surface in the Angel comic I will probably stop reading very quickly. I just want to see how Willingham is going to write the Angel/Spike dynamic. Since that's important to me, if I don't like what he does, I'll drop the book.

And still no word on when the Spike book will be out. It's not in IDW's February solicits.

Profile

shadowkat: (Default)
shadowkat

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 03:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »